Political BLOG |
![]() March 2008
Categories
More WHAS11 Blogs
|
|
Mark Nickolas of bluegrassreport.org first discovered that Bruce Lunsford had lifted much of his Blueprint for Change from campaign position papers of a candidate for governor in Florida. Now, the Lexington Herald-Leader has added that Steve Beshear has also copied ideas and verbiage from another candidate for governor. Here's the Herald-Leader's blog entry: April 18, 2007 FRANKFORT — Campaign material published by two Democratic candidates for governor closely mirrors that of two gubernatorial candidates in other states. Portions of a “Blueprint for Change” mailed to 200,000 Kentuckians last week by the gubernatorial campaign of Bruce Lunsford are worded similarly to the 2006 platform of unsuccessful Florida Democratic nominee for governor Jim Davis. Also, the language in an energy plan pushed by Steve Beshear resembles that of Chet Culver, a Democrat elected governor of Iowa last year. Both the Lunsford and Beshear campaigns acknowledged yesterday that they had used language pulled from the Web sites of the out-of-state campaigns, but said it was not plagiarism. “We just took some stock language from it and applied it to Kentucky,” said Adam Bozzi, press secretary for Lunsford. Beshear’s campaign manager, Jim Cauley, said the campaign saw Culver’s plan for energy online “and we liked it.” “A good idea is a good idea,” he said. Bozzi noted that a major part of the 23-page Lunsford plan involves providing health care coverage for all Kentuckians. “The Davis plan did not address that,” Bozzi said. The Lunsford plan does use language that is similar to Davis’ on a number of other issues. For example, a position paper on Davis’ Web site lays out this plan for Florida’s children: “The first years of a child’s learning are vitally important and provide the foundation for academic success. As governor, Davis will invest in a quality Pre-K program and expand early childhood education learning opportunities ... Investing in quality Pre-K and early learning opportunities is an important component of improving outcomes in K-12 education.” The Lunsford-Stumbo blueprint says: “The first years of a child’s learning are vitally important and provide the foundation for academic success. That means we must give every child in Kentucky the opportunity to attend pre-kindergarten ... Investing in quality Pre-K and early learning opportunities is a vital component of improving outcomes in K-12 education.” Portions of the energy policies of Beshear and Culver also match closely. For example, Culver’s plan says: “As Governor, I will challenge the private sector and encourage the development of new power sources, fuels and clean coal technologies by developing new laws and regulations that encourage innovation and the production and sale of home grown fuels.” The Beshear plan states: “As Governor, I will challenge the private sector and encourage the development of new renewable power sources, alternative fuels and clean coal technologies by developing new laws and regulations that spur innovation and the production and sale of home grown fuels.” In explaining the similar wording in Lunsford’s “Blueprint for Change,” Bozzi said Tait Sye, Lunsford’s communications director, was on Davis’ campaign staff last year. “Tait was one of the primary people who wrote the Lunsford-Stumbo blueprint,” Bozzi said. “We looked at ideas throughout the country. Jim Davis had a lot of good ideas and we wanted to emulate them.” Bozzi also noted that Lunsford has often stated on the campaign trail that 16 other states have a Children’s Kitchen Cabinet to focus on improving the lives of children and families. That idea also was in the Davis plan. “We don’t have to come up with all new ideas,” Bozzi said. “We have to come up with ideas that we think Kentucky needs and Bruce Lunsford has the ability to make them work in Kentucky.” Lunsford, a Louisville businessman, and Beshear, a Lexington lawyer and former lieutenant governor, are two of seven candidates in the May 22 Democratic primary election. - Jack Brammer and John Stamper 5 CommentsLeave a comment |
WHAS11.com Political Blog
WHAS11 Reporters blog the latest political news from the campaign trail and beyond.
|
|
I would hope that all canididates would look for good ideals. No one is smart enough to come up with everything wrong with Kentucky. But at least 2 have a plan. Mark Nickolas is a sore looser because he was Chandler mamager and is backing Miller for Governor. Miller is receiving 8% in the polls and he will do anything to catch you. Maybe he only has 8% because he doesn't have any ideals and is jealous that others have something to talk about. All we need in Kentucky is another Governor who doesn't know what he is doing. The last 12 years are enough.
first, you need to learn how to spell. then, you should observe miller's website, and see that he has far more detailed plans than the other old-time candidates who think they're entitled to the job.
I spelled good enough for you to understand what I said. I am sorry I am not prefect. I didn't know that was a requirement. I thought Jesus was the last to be perfect. If miller has a plan he sure didn't bring it to the debates. His presentations was terrible on the debates. Miller is a young kid trying to play in a mans world.
I have read Lunsford blueprint for change. If he passes 50% of what he has in his blue print for change he will move Kentucky ahead 10 years. We need Lunsford to put in the programs what he has purposed to make up for the last 12 years that Kentucky has been sinking to the bottom.
newsflash: lunsfraud didn't even write 50% of that garbage. he plagiarized it! what an amateur. proof that money does not equal intelligence. that ticket is done, you better come over to the miller side, flint. dems need a winner not a fraud.
Of course it was lifted from other candidates... They all hire the same people to manage their campaigns. Look at the campaign managers for all the candidates running and you'll see they all worked in other states for other elected officials.
Also, most states face the same problems, so offering up the same solutions (if they make sense) isn't something that should be ridiculed, but encouraged.