Political BLOG |
![]() March 2008
Categories
More WHAS11 Blogs
|
|
University of Louisville president Jim Ramsey was in the halls of the capitol on tuesday, not begging for money, but begging for mercy and a chance to explain some things he said earlier this month. At a House Health and Welfare committee meeting in early March, Ramsey was testifying about U of L's opposition to a senate bill that would bar all state agencies from offering health insurance coverage to the unmarried partners of their employees. The bill was aimed at stopping U of L from offering coverage to the gay partners of U of L employees. So Ramsey was in Frankfort, meeting with Damron and other legislators who were led by a Family Foundation push to believe that Ramsey had lied to them. In separate interviews, Ramsey told me he was telling the truth at the time of the meeting. An actuarial study done in 2006 had concluded that the premiums charged would cover all the medical bills. That hasn't turned out to be the case. Ramsey also says U of L will look for ways to make sure the domestic partner insurance controversy doesn't get ugly in the 2008 legislative session. He wouldn't say how he plans to dampen that controversy, but he's not going to ask the U of L Board of Trustees to back off the policy. Ramsey believes it fosters campus diversity and helps U of L keep and recruit star researchers and teachers. Rep. Damron says he's not mad at Ramsey and doesn't think the controversy over Ramsey's statements will hurt U of L's credibility with lawmakers. But Damron does expect the legislature to ban domestic partner benefits at state agencies next year. 1 CommentsLeave a comment |
WHAS11.com Political Blog
WHAS11 Reporters blog the latest political news from the campaign trail and beyond.
|
|
Are you married, Mr. Hebert? If so, do you typically refer to your spouse as your "lover"? Using that word in the context of domestic partnerships seems a bit lurid if not incendiary. Any poll using such terminology would almost certainly be defined as a "push poll" crafted to encourage negative responses to the prospect of employers, particularly in the public sector, offering coverage to the unmarried partners of their employees. I think this was an unfortunate lapse in an otherwise well-written posting.