Political BLOG

Mark Hebert
March 2008
S M T W T F S
           
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
         

Categories

More WHAS11 Blogs


Is Barack Chicken? UPDATE

10:16 AM Mon, Feb 26, 2007 |
Mark Hebert

Barack Obama had the most unusual handling of the news media that I've ever heard of for a prospective presidential candidate when he was in Louisville on Sunday.

Initially, Obama staff told reporters they wouldn't be allowed into the Marriott Hotel ballroom during the senator's speech. Then TV stations were told they wouldn't be allowed in the room, but print reporters were OK. Eventually, Louisville TV stations shot video from the hallway, through a door and into the ballroom. Obama answered a couple of questions after his speech.

Now, if I had my druthers, every one of these visits by presidential candidates should be closed to the media. I hate covering them. The candidates rarely say much of substance and rarely answer questions from the news media. They're generally made-for-TV events. So I could live with Obama giving his speech and leaving town. I just don't understand it, from his perspective. Obviously, he didn't come to Louisville because of Kentucky's early primary election.....we don't have one. And he didn't come to Louisville to rake in big bucks. There was no fundraiser and the sold out tickets were just $25. So I'm thinking he's hear to spread his message. I assume Obama wants as many people as possible to hear him. So why block out the media?

I only have two possible explanations. One is that Obama has shown himself to be a little thin skinned. I've seen a couple dust ups on network TV when Obama has been asked a tough question and didn't handle it well, getting snippy with a reporter.
The other possibility is that he's hoping less media attention will create more buzz among voters who want to see him, kind of like Sony Corp. putting a limited number of Play Stations on the market in hopes of creating buzz and demand. That scenario gives Obama the benefit of a doubt.

Maybe there's a third scenario. Maybe Obama isn't quite ready to play with the big boys. Again, from this reporter's perspective, keeping the media out of a presidential campaign appearance is fine with me, I just don't see the logic from a candidate's perspective.

UPDATE.....SOME LOUSY REPORTING BY ME!!!!! THERE WAS A FUNDRAISER IN LOUISVILLE AFTER THE OBAMA EVENT. IT APPARENTLY RAISED MORE THAN $300,000 FOR OBAMA'S CAMPAIGN, ACCORDING TO A COUPLE OF SOURCES WHO ATTENDED. SO MAYBE OBAMA WAS HERE FOR THE MONEY!!!



4 Comments

Jeff Noble said:

I think your "other possibility" is the answer for the moment. Too much Obama vis-a-vis the media makes each successive interview less worthwhile, both to you in the media, and to us in the electorate. Making the electorate come to terms with the candidate one-on-one, whether by an event such as last night's or through internet-interaction, creates a more personal connectivity and relationship than sound bites, which as you point out are usually designed to say very little, can ever do.

Bojangles said:

Hebert for Hillary? Edwards?

Ed Springston said:

Wish I had that problem months ago. The media wasn't interested in an outside candidate for Mayor here such as myself until way late in the race. Ah the media is a funny thing. Lol.

Darran Winslow said:

I dont speak for the individuals that brought Obama to Louisville, but it is my understanding that they felt it was more importnat to fill the room with "paying customres". If they allowed media they would have had to set aside space for you. As you said ourself, how Kentuckians vote will not decide this elsection (so TV is irrelevant) but how they spend their dollars can help decide this election.

I think they made the right call.


Leave a comment





Type the characters you see in the picture above.