Political BLOG

Mark Hebert
March 2008
S M T W T F S
           
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
         

Categories

More WHAS11 Blogs


Ford Squeezing Louisville Lawmakers

8:39 PM Tue, Feb 13, 2007 |
Mark Hebert

Louisville area lawmakers have an interesting dilemma on their hands in regards to proposed money for Ford Motor Company's plants in Louisville.

Governor Fletcher has proposed spending $10 million of the projected $401 million surplus on retraining for Ford workers in Louisville. It's one incentive to try and keep the two Louisville Ford plants off the company's future chopping block. As you'd expect, Louisville lawmakers support the $10 million in training money, mainly because Ford has 9,000 employees (voters) working at its Louisville plants.

Here's the dilemma: How do you convince lawmakers who don't want to spend the projected surplus to fund one project (the Ford training money) while turning down all of the other groups who are clamoring for money to be stuffed into the state budget? Louisville legislators will claim their money is needed now to show Ford officials the state is serious about negotiating a deal to keep the two plants open. But Governor Fletcher has a plan to spend about $200 million on several other pet projects, many of which he considers "emergencies". House budget committee chairman Harry Moberly, Speaker Jody Richards and Senate President David Williams have all said they'd rather not open up the budget, prefering to hold on to any expected surplus until 2008, when all worthy projects and programs will be reevaluated TOGETHER to determine which ones should be funded in a new state budget. In other words, Louisville lawmakers will have a tough time telling their colleagues that the $10 million for Ford/Louisville is more worthy than the myriad of other proposals on the table.



2 Comments

If Ford Motor Company moves from moves from this area, there will be many more jobs lost in support and service companies that depend upon Ford business. Our company, included, would be forced to downsize.

Ed Springston said:

Well said Robert. This discussion is one that should have been held in January 2006 when Ford annonced the way Forward plan. If we would have jumped on board early and made a deal then we would not be in the situation we are today.

As Ford has gotten worse over thelast year that was a gamble we took that will now affect not only Ford employees but people directly and indirectly who depend on the revenue from Ford including corporate and personal taxes to fund services.

The narrow minded approach is one I pointe dout during the election that sadly appears to have bit us now.


Leave a comment





Type the characters you see in the picture above.