i think that both should do time cause they both had something to do with it so just make it fair and both of them do 2years and after that they do 1year probation. that my opinion and its staying that way thank you.

10/30/07

Thank You,

Danelle Lufcy

I am always amaze by the comments that people who thinks David Camm is guilty makes.None of them can peace the events together and none of what they say makes sense.Now, after Boney faced David and the gun, he went back in the garage and beat up Kim in front of David, yes that makes perfect sense!!!Come on!!!The defense were able to prove how the blood got on the shirt and it fits what David said at the beginning.I am sure that David is not guilty because I've looked at every scenarios possible .I would like for once that if somebody who thinks that camm is guilty, comes up with a possible scenario that makes sense.Instead all they can say is "two juries found him guilty so he is".I found that so ignorant, knowing what's going on in the justice system.

I am always amaze by the comments that people who thinks David Camm is guilty makes.None of them can peace the events together and none of what they say makes sense.Now, after Boney faced David and the gun, he went back in the garage and beat up Kim in front of David, yes that makes perfect sense!!!Come on!!!The defense were able to prove how the blood got on the shirt and it fits what David said at the beginning.I am sure that David is not guilty because I've looked at every scenarios possible .I would like for once that if somebody who thinks that camm is guilty, comes up with a possible scenario that makes sense.Instead all they can say is "two juries found him guilty so he is".I found that so ignorant, knowing what's going on in the justice system.

David Camm is GUILTY. He was convicted TWICE and he is GUILTY. The high-velocity blood spatter of Jill's blood on his shirt says it all. Boney was at the scene, too, as he provided the gun, left his palm print, and messed up poor Kim's feet. But, CAMM pulled the trigger - 3 times. There is NO miscarriage of justice, Camm is exactly where he belongs, the hulking whale. GUILTY!

What is new about the case?Did people gave up?

Travis,

Can you update this blog regarding law professor Thomas Schornhorst joining this case?

David Camm is innocent!! There was a rush to judgement in the first trial. Because Camm is such a dispicable person people seem not to care that he is innocent. There is a much larger issue here. We are all jepardized when an innocent person is prosecuted and found guilty.
After they found the real killer that should have put an end to Camm's case.
I don't know how the second prosecutor can live with himself. Just because you can obtain a conviction doesn't mean you have to prosecute.
Free Camm ASAP. We need to free Camm for our own good!!!!

This was reported by Abby Miller WLKY February 20,2002. This was the first trial.

Prosecution Yet To Wrap Up Case

A defense expert in the David Camm murder trial testified Wednesday even though the prosecutor has yet to wrap up its case. The defense expert testified Wednesday because the defense was supposed to begin it's case by now, and she had already scheduled a return flight.
The expert was brought in to testify about a mysterious grey sweatshirt found at the murder scene propped underneath Bradley Camm.
Testing revealed that the sweatshirt contained several unknown samples of DNA, Miller reported.
Defense lawyer Mike McDaniel believes that that's proof that someone else was in the garage besides David Camm.
"We want to show that there was someone else in the garage that left behind the garment, and that person could as well be the killer as anybody," McDaniel said.
"The sweatshirt absolutely doesn't prove nothing," lead prosecutor Stan Faith said. "It doesn't prove that there was anyone else in the garage. It a wild fantasy to think that a sweatshirt with DNA with a male and female on it... were they both wearing the sweatshirt at the same time? Is that the explanation?" Abby Miller

Not much CSI going on here!!! This man concluded what he wanted to conclude. He intimidated anyone that would voice anything but what he wanted to hear. He singlemindedly vilified a man that didn't have a chance against the accusation that were thrown at him. All his underlings wouldn't dare say or even think anything to the contrary. If he had been for true justice and tested the sweatshirt and found Charles Boney all of his underlings would have went along with that also. Most of the public go along with their lives and hear bits and pieces of the news. Rumors fly and untruths are taken as facts. People hearing Stan Faith accusing David Camm of these horrible taboos and human nature turns bloodthirsty. This is the same thing that triggers mobs. This sets off pleasure and power for some people. Hearing the simple truth is too mundane. Being objective is killed on the spot when Stan Faith uttered his evil accusation. But why? Why didn't Stan Faith look at all the evidence equally? Why was he so quick to accuse David Camm when he had witnesses. Why did he want to quickly convince people that he had the killer? He had been a law student and he knew what buttons to push. But why? What compelled him so viciously? Mike Nifong was compelled to hang the Duke Lacrosse players running blindedly with his evil accusations.
By having 12 jurors we would hope that not all are driven by emotions and or easily led by showmen and someone's burning ambitions. The OJ Simpson trial was just this kind of circus. Common sense left the planet for a lot of people. Raw emotions ruled. Justice was not served.
Raw emotions was the rule in the David Camm trial also.

Reported by James Zambroski Wave3, April 11, 2005.

Prosecutors say Charles Boney may be an ex-con who has committed crimes against women, but there's not enough evidence to charge him with murdering Kim Camm and her children.
This despite newly developed evidence that places his DNA on the sweatshirt found near the body of Bradley Camm when he was murdered in the garage of the family home in Georgetown almost 5 years ago.
Testing last week confirmed--and Boney admitted to investigators--that the prison-issued sweatshirt belonged to him. He said he gave it to the Salvation Army upon his release from the penitentiary following a sentence for armed robbery.
Camm's defense team seized on that identification as proof that David Camm did not murder his family. Prosecutors say that after 23 hours of interrogation and other investigation, they don't have enough evidence to charge Boney, but that they have not completely ruled him out as a suspect.
"Either David Camm acted alone or David Camm acted in concert," Floyd
County prosecutor Keith Henderson said Monday, but added: "We have not ruled out Charles Boney."
"There's one piece of evidence that links Charles Boney to that crime scene, and that's that sweatshirt that has been staged at that scene, " Henderson said.
Camm's defense says Boney's shirt at the crime scene proves Camm didn't do it and that charges against him should be dropped. Prosecutors scoffed at that suggestion.
"Mr. Boney's going to come out of jail, go to somebody's house in Georgetown, brutally murder three people and then say 'Oh, I think I'll take off my sweatshirt that I got from DOC(department of corrections) and lay it down here by the boy.'"
"Does that make sense to anyone?" asked Steve Owen, Chief Deputy Prosecutor for Floyd County. "Because it doesn't make sense to me."
However, Owen suggested another scenario that does make sense, "It does make sense that somebody who killed those people thought "Hey, I got a sweatshirt that don't belong to me and I know that don't belong to me,' and roll that sweatshirt up and lay it by his boy's side. Now that makes sense, "Owen said.
Boney told investigators that he has an airtight alibi. James Zambroski

This is all so unbelievable!! These prosecutors are supposed to be intelligent and fight for justice. They were so scared when Charles Boney came upon the scene, they tried to play it down everyway they could. If his palm print had not been found Keith Henderson and Steve Owen would have danced and jumped up and slapped hands. Charles Boney would have forever been free!! This kind of justice scares the hell of of me.

About the palm print, why is there only a palm and no finger prints ? Boney had to be careful,try to put only your palm on a surface...wouldn't be consistent also that if boney lost his balance because of the struggle, he kept himself from falling while being aware of finger prints and holding his fingers up so it wouldn'd touch the Bronco to leave prints????

The palm print was on the passenger side, up there on the same side where Kim was found ,right?Wouldn't be consistent with the fact that Kim fought for her life and Boney had to hold himself up,losing his balance.About the sweat shirt, did Boney ever change his story of how it ended up in the Bronco, because the salvation box's story doesn't fit anymore since we know Boney was there that night.Also, how can they give that guy any credibility, he lied so easily in the first interview challenging the investigators, saying none of his print would be found because he wasn't there. He even said "If my print was there that mean I would I've been there, but you will never find any so I wasn't there".Boney will never admit to the crime until they find more proof ,he would have never admitted to be on the scene if his print haven't been found.So what now, David Camm is staying in jail for a crime he didn't commit until they find more evidences against Boney...But now the crime scene really was cleaned up by Faith, making sure that no evidences were left to incriminate his friend ,Boney.I would have been curious to see DNA on that nail found in the Bronco,how did it end up discarted? It was an important peace... What convince the jury that Boney wasn't the shooter?One more thing, why Camm would need to buy two guns instead of one?Now with so many mistakes ,im my opinion ,they need to exhume Kim's body to perform an other autopsy.I know it would be painful for many people,but isn't it the only way to find the truth???I am sure ,that spending your life in prison for a crime you didn't do is also very painful, beside the fact of losing your family to such a grewsome crime.

Reported by Carrie Harned WAVE tv news August 21, 2005.

Boney Says he has alibi night the Camm family was killed.
Charles Boney is now at the center of the Camm case. The prosecution thinks he's a man with extremely bad luck, but the defense isn't buying it. Boney admits he's no angel. In fact, he has a very violent past. But Boney told Carrie Harned that after years in prison, he has changed his ways.
For the first time in nearly five years, the shadow of suspicion has been cast on someone other than David Camm. Charles Boney. I asked Boney point blank if he killed David Camm's family, "No, I did not," he replied.
Boney says his crimianl past is now coming back to haunt him. "People never look at you the same. Once you've done something, they always look at you like he's gonna be the bad guy."
And that's the question both sides of this case are scrambling to answer: is Charles Boney still a bad guy?
After all, a sweatshirt with his DNA was found near the bodies of Kim and Brad Camm. "I did purchase that sweatshirt when I was in prison at the Indiana State Prison,"Boney admits. "It had my nickname in it, which is 'Backbone.'"
But Boney says he no longer owned that sweatshirt when Kim, Jill and Bradley Camm were murdered on September 28, 2000. "Specifically, what I did with the prison clothes, I sent them to the little drop box at the Salvation Army."
When I asked Boney if he took the clothes there himself, he answered: "I physiclly took them there."
Sources close to the prosecution say Boney's story checks out. Prosecutors questioned him recently for more that 22 hours and found no loopholes. He says he was shocked to find out he was being questioned in connection with the triple murder.
When I got to the Floyd County Building, they told me this involved a triple homicide, and I was just dumbfounded," Boney said. "I was like, 'what does this have to do with me?'"
Besides the DNA match, there are an amazing number of coincidences. Boney's criminal past dates back to the late 80's.
In 1989, he was convicted of three counts of robbery and one count of attempted robbery in Bloomington, Indiana. In each case, he was after one thing: a woman's shoe.
Court documents show he tackled, wrestled with, hit and hurt his victims. He was sentenced to five years in prison, but served only six months.
Then in 1993, he was sentenced to 20 years for three counts of armed robbery and three counts of criminal confinement. In those cases, Boney used a gun to threaten his victims.
Boney admits his past don't look good. When I pointed out that there are issues with shoes that are unexplained in the Camm case from the crime scene where his sweatshirt was found, he said it was the first he had heard of it.
I asked if he was worried about that aspect of the case and he said, "not at all."
Kim Camm's shoes were found on top of the Ford Bronco the night of the murders. There were also injuries to the top of her feet. Investigators have always been puzzled by both facts.
Boney says there's no connection to his shoe crimes and the Camm case. He says the incidents involving him taking womens' shoes were part of "a fraternity prank. It was stupid. I can't even put into words what it was."
Boney denies having a shoe fetish.
Boney says his rap sheet represents a past that's behind him now, and claims prison did him good.
"When I was in prison, I had what is called an epiphany. A spiritual awakening. It wasn't so much a godly spiritual awakening. It was just an awakening of 'hey man, you're going on the wrong track.'"
But we uncovered a Domestic Violence Order dated December 31, 2003--three years after his release from prison.
In it, his estranged wife says Boney physically harmed her five times including:
* hitting her in the face with his fist;
* knocking her to the ground and hitting
her head againt the floor;
* pointing a gun at her; and
* using a stun gun on her several times.
Boney says "I was just wrong for what I had done.
As for an alibi, Boney says he's covered.
There were three sets of people that I remember seeing that day. "They have all been interviewd and they all have a testament regarding my whereabouts and they are my alibi."
Boney says he has an alibi for 7 o'clock September 28, 2000. I can honestly say I do."
Now as the spotlight shifts to include him, Boney says he feels the heat. "It's not my call to judge whether David Camm did what he did. All I have to do is make sure that everyone knows that I had nothing to do with it."
Finger prints were found on the Camm family Bronco, not far from the shoes. Right now, both sides are testing them against Boney's. Court documents show he has taken two polygraphs; one came back inconclusive, and the other possible deception.
But a jury will never hear about either test, since polygraphs are not admissible in court. Carrie Harned

After five years most people were conviced that David Camm murdered his family after Stan Faith spewed out words like affairs, child molestation, phone records and insurance forgery. Camm admitted to his infidelity. He adamently denied child molestation. There was never proof of child molestation. The phone records were proven wrong. The insurance forgery was proven wrong. The damage was already done. When his conviction was overturned the case was handed to prosecutor Keith Henderson. He had 5 years of believing David Camm was guilty. He was suprised when Charles Boney entered the picture. He played down Boney's involvement. This started a win at any cost for him and Steve Owen. Keith Henderson is a prosecutor first and foremost, that is his job. It is a political job. He pulled out all the stops. He played the molestation card as his last words to the jury. David Camm did not molest his daughter and cause her injuries. Charles Boney did this the night he murdered her.

As reported by Ben Hershberg of the Courier-Journal November 27th, 2006.

Boney robbery victim seeks legislation.
Donna Ennis has spoken to few people about the harrowing night in October 1992 when she was threatened at gunpoint by Charles Boney, who was convicted early this year of murder and conspiracy in the slayings of David Camm's family. But Ennis said she decided to speak out in a campaign to seek legislation that would prevent criminal sentences from being reduced after a second conviction--as happened with Boney. "I feel a sense of guilt" that Boney was released from jail two years early in her case after he was convicted of armed robbery, said Ennis, who was a student at Indiana University in Bloomington when she and her roommates encountered Boney.
They saw anger and the potential for great violence in their assailant, Ennis said. "I thought we were going to die."
Ennis, now 34, of Charlestown, wrote in response to a question from the court before Boney's release in June 2000 that she didn't believe he should get out early.
"I feel like I should have done more," she said.
Some additional effort, she said, might have prevented Boney's involvement in the Camm Killing less than four months after his release.
Until now, Ennis said, she has told few people about the harrowing incident during her college days because it's still painful.
But she realized she had to talk about it one morning in February 2005 when she saw a picture of Boney on television as she was getting ready for work.
"I screamed, 'It was him,'"Ennis recalled, the memories of her experience flooding back.
One night, when she and two roomates were in their apartment near the university, Boney walked through the front door that had been left open. He had a revolver and said, "This is a robbery," Ennis recalled.
The gun was loaded, "Ennis said, with the bullets visible in the cylinder.
Boney demanded something like $781, Ennis said, explaining that she doesn't know why he asked for such a specific amount.
Boney repeatedly said in angry tones that the roommates were rich, white women, Ennis recalled. He looked through all the rooms, holding the women at gunpoint and taking his time.
One of her roommates had a photo of her father in his Indiana State Police uniform on a table, Ennis said, and when Boney saw it he slammed the photo down and said, "I hate cops."
Part of the time, Enis said, Boney held the loaded gun to her head.
After the women told Boney they didn't have the money on hand, he forced them into one of their cars so they could drive to an ATM.
But as the car was backing up, police who had been called by a neighbor seeing suspicious activity swarmed around the vehicle and arrested Boney.
At Camm's retrial, his lawyers attempted to tell the jury about the incident, But the judge ruled that it and other details of Boney's criminal history were inadmissible. Reported By Ben Hershberg (Courier-Journal)

Here a little something I would like to add.I have been thinking about it for a while but I was holding back because ,even if it was years ago ,I am still ashame about it.I was molested by my own dad for 14 years so were my brother and sisters.A child molester don't chose their victim randomly and it don't stop at one victim.When they do those nasty acts they just become an other person just like they were having a split personality.This is why I know for a fact that if Whitney said that her daddy didn't touch her in any inappropriate way,he for sure didn't do it to Jill.So be it with the molesting motive.Jill wasn't molested by her dad.

Some very good comment have been done on Clemons Testimony(January 20 2006)by PLJRhodes.If you are interrested to read it, many things that weren't even told and seemed very important.

This was reported by Jeff Tang March 29th, 2006

Years before Charles Boney was ever mentioned as a suspect, David Camm was the sole focus for his family's murders. As Jeff Tang investigates the justice former Floyd County Prosecutor Stan Faith was looking for may have been closer than he ever imagined.
Faith tried Camm in 2002. In that case, unknown DNA found at the scene was never identified, even though Faith says he asked for tests to be conducted.
Last year, the unknown DNA was finally identified as belonging to Boney--the now convicted murderer Faith never considered as a suspect in 2002 and would actually become his client two years later.
I was his attorney in 2004, "Faith said, "Naturally I didn't know I was sitting with a killer. It was a child support case, and termination of his probation in Bloomington.
Faith admits to driving Boney home from jail that day--going above and beyond the duties of an attorney because of Faith's relationship with Boney's mother that dates back to the 80's.
I've known her many years, yes, in a political arena, "Faith said. "In 1986, when I was first running, she was a supporter.
But Faith says he never met Charles Boney until 2004, well after he prosecuted the first Camm case. Still, it is a bizarre coincidence.
When asked if he intentionally ignored the sweatshirt DNA because it belonged to Boney, Faith replied: "Absolutely not. I would turn in my own mother on something like that."
In fact, Faith has been criticized for the way he handled Boney's DNA, which was unidentified at the time.
I regret it. I deeply regret it, but the myth that's growing out of this is false. "Faith said. "We tested that shirt up one side and down the other."
Faith says that should be enough to prove there was no conspiracy to exclude Boney as a suspect the first time the case was tried.
Faith told us he has "no relationship with Charles Boney other than a professional relationship during a month's time. I didn't know he existed before that, and didn't care -- don't care now."
Faith pointe out that DNA from three unidentified people were actually discovered on the sweatshirt found at the murder scene. Two female samples were cross-referenced with Indiana's criminal database, but the third, a male sample was not. Camm's defense attorneys later confirmed that male DNA belonged to Boney, and he was arrested a sort time later. Reported by Jeff Tang.

Does anyone else believe that he know Charles Boney's mother since the 80's and didn't know she had a son named Charles?

This was reported by James Zambroski Feb 23th, 2006.
Lynn Scamahorn, A DNA analyst from the Indiana State Police, is a university trained scientist who analyzes blood and DNA. She tested all the clothing in the Camm case in both trials.
On the stand Tuesday, Scamahorn testified that former Floyd County Prosecutor Stan Faith threatened her when she wouldn't say she found Camm's DNA on Charles Boney's sweatshirt after conducting more than 300 tests.
She said she found his DNA on his clothing, as well as on Kim's but not on Boney's sweatshirt.
Scamahorn said when she refused to change her testimony during Camm's first trial in 2002, Faith was infuriated, screaming at her, and telling her he's have her fired, and charged with a felony -- obstructing justice, if she wasn't able to find Camm's DNA.
Scamahorn says she detailed Faith's threats in a letter to her supervisor. She briefly broke down in tears during Tuesday's testimoney, prompting the judge to call a recess. Reported by James Zambroski.

I applaud this woman, she had the courage to stand up for what she believed in.

I just finished reading a very good book that explained how investigators and prosecution work,"The innocent man" by John Grisham.Even though ,the case of Ron Williamson is different to David Camm, both convicted killer were put in jail because of their character.In both cases investigators have made many mistakes such as not properly collecting evidences from the beginning, foccusing on one person and forget to investigate further suspects and lying to make the investigation fit with the crime.First,I have learn in that book that the primary concern of investigators is not to find the right person who did the crime but to close the case as soon as possible. Once they find somebody they think is guilty ,investigators and prosecutors are going to prove that person made the crime guilty or not. To top it off ,they will never ever admit they were wrong in the process because they have a reputation to protect,it is sickning to see how the system works.First, I understand why David Camm was a suspect in this case, but Camm always stick to his story and
his story fits with the crime. The blood spatter, that strong evidence which help the investigation, was put in questioning when david Camm said what he did that night(blood stranfer).In fact, the defense's blood expert explained it better since they were only 8 spots, everybody knows that a gun shot would have made much more blood ,plus the blood wasn't inbaded in the shirt so their strongest evidence is not so strong anymore...As for their theory that Camm leaved the Gym and come back after killing his family is so ridiculous,it's IMPOSSIBLE.David Camm would have had 7 minutes to kill his wife and kids because of the driving time.So, he would have had 7 minutes to kill and get this encounter with Boney, I don't understand how that could be believe by anyone.Boney's kept changing his story to make it fit ,the sweatshirt in the salvation drop-box(now how did it end up at the crime scene?),at first he didn't know David after he did,he wasn't at the crime scene after he was ,he even scratch part of his writen testimony, there he was, changing story again!!!!The investigator promess Dave that if they found some other possible suspect, they would consider strongly the fact, what a bunch of crap!!!One of the blood expert was threaten by the prosecution that she would lost her job if she didn't testify in their favor, go Henderson!!!How mane people were threaten? This is one of the similarity you have with Peterson(prosecutor of Ron Williamson).I am sure Henderson helped Boney with his story also...I have read in my book that what often helped convince the jury is the tape interview from investigators, how funny ,that was the only request that the jury of the second trial made the tapes, mmmm The guy is under pressure, he is nervous rack ,you can rely on that.One other tape was asked by the jury was Camm talking to the investigator trying to get information, honnestly I don't know one person who wouldn,t do the same. David WAS ACCUSED OF MURDER, I would want to know what is going on tooo, beside the fact that he was a police and knew how rotten the system was...Unfortunately, justice haven't been done in this case and i wish that a GOOD judge will see that.David Camm is innocent.I recommend the book of John Grisham "The innocent man", it seems that the investigation was lead as wrongly in David Camm's case!!!Poor investigation work and poor prosecution.

It would be a wonderful thing if we could pull together and get this innocent man the verdict he deserves. How can our judicial system be so messed up? We need to right the wrongs that were made by our county prosecutors!

I think that both men have issues with women. That in itself is very damaging informationn and makes it hard to decipher "who" could have molested this little girl. I find it hard to believe that ten people, all men, can honestly say that Mr. Cam was in their sight the entire time at that gym. That would mean that in all those hours he did not even disappear to the men's room for 15 minutes. I find that hard to believe. So their testimony does not hold much weight with me. The ex con is a liar. The end. You cannot trust anything this man says. As for David, his problems exist because he is seen as conductingn unethical behavior through his many affairs and the blood stains on his shirt. Neither, which directly prove that he orchestrated the murder of his entire family, except for the high velocity of blood splattered. That is the key piece of evidence along with his character that make him guilty. How many State Troopers quit their job to stay home with their small children? What was the real motive there? More time with the little gir? More time to conduct affairs? He is guilty of a lot. Whether he is guilty of murder or child molestation is yet to be proven. Most child molestors have been molested themselves as children, have either men convicted had past experiences with being molested? I doubt that he molested his own daughter. One clue, when he made the statement"We're talking about my 5 year old daughter here"...that is not the statement of a molestor. That is someone who is saying, "Are you kidding me? That is insane!" A normal reaction of someone who is NOT a child molestor. I think the prosecution if far reaching to say that he was getting ready to be "found out" for being a child molestor and that is his motive. Now, let's look at the other man Charles...does he have weird or out of the ordinary sexual desires? A shoe fettish? Issues with women?" Yes. Man sexual deviants engage in strange or abnormal behavior such as Mr. Boney's past history with women. I say, let God be the judge of Mr. Cam. I would rather put him back on the streets than put an innocent man behind bars. Let God be his judge. If he did it, he will pay in hell. If he did not, God be with him. Regardless, it is a blessing that Charles Boney has been sentenced to 225 years. Now that is a freak who does not belong in society.

This is a news article dated march 15, 2006 as reported by Janelle MacDonald.

(New Albany, Ind.)--David Camm has been the focus in Charles Boney's murder trial. Boney is accused of helping Camm murder his family in September 2000. On Tuesday, prosecutors introduced a fouth set of statements Boney gave police when he first came under suspicion in 2005. The statements read in court Tuesday were made by Charles Boney on March 7, 2005. It was the second round of statements he made to police that day, and his fourth statement in all.
In the second March 7 statement, Boney's story changes from what he told detectives in earlier statements. Boney said he first met Camm playing basketball at Community Park in New Albany. He then said that he and Camm met a second time after that, and Camm asked Boney to get him an untraceable gun.
Boney says he got a gun from Louisville the same day and sold it to Camm. At that point, Boney says Camm asked him to get a second gun, and they set up a meeting date--September 28, 2000--the day Kim, Bradley and Jill Camm were killed.
In his statement, Boney said he met Camm as agreed but Camm didn't have the money with him and Boney didn't have the gun yet. Boney then followed Camm to hs home in Georgetown, Indiana so Camm could get the money. While they were there, Boney said Kim Camm pulled up in the Bronco with Jill and Brad inside.
"The person inside the Bronco, which would have been Mrs. Camm, she waved at me, but she had a look on her face like, 'who's that?' because obviously she didn't know me."
Boney said Camm left and went inside the garage for about three to six minutes. He said he heard a heated exchange between David and Kim, then heard Kim yell "NO!" followed by three shots.
Boney said in his statement that he 'never discussed with him what he would do with the weapons, or what he needed them for.
Prosecutor Steve Owen pointed out that even if Boney didn't know Camm was planning to kill his family, he was still part of the crime for not reporting it or doing anything about it.
According to Boney's statement, after the three gunshots, Camm came out of the garage and aimed the gun at Boney, but it jammed. That's when Boney said he went into the garage, looked around and left. As he was leaving, he said he saw a car turning into the driveway. He said a woman was at the wheel.
One of Boney's final statement on Marth 7th: "I wish I would have just told you guys the truth...David Camm, he killed his family, with me as a witness."

Folks, can you believe a man would be convicted on evidence like this?? The prosecutors starting with Stan Faith ending with Keith Henderson and Steve Owen railroaded David Camm. What a horrible mistake the justice systems has made. Why were mistakes made? The first prosecutor, Stan Faith wanted to be a big hero and find the murderer, jumping to in his mind, the husband. He ignored dna evidence that proved someone else was in the garage. When Keith Henderson and Steve Owen had the change to get to the truth, their sacred political ambitions were raging hot. They knew that Stan Faith had made David Camm an evil person in the eyes of public opinion. All he had was that David Camm was unfaithful to Kim, but he played it up adding child molestion as a probability and insurance money. This is all the suggestion that the public had to hear. Public opinion cried, Guilty-Guilty. Most of public opinion is now satisfied. This is one of the worst examples of railroading a person for personal political gain.

Stan Faith, Keith Henderson and Steve Owen should be disbarred. Now it is up to the Indiana Supreme court to see the truth. We will see the ambitions of the Indiana Supreme court. Career or Justice!

There is one thing I don't get in all that.Why can all the evidences be presented to the judge,I am saying all...I don't think that Jill was molested,notthing that have been said prooved it either, David Camm is no child molester.But this is not my point.My point is that the judge needs to know everything about Boney,I mean the whole story.Beside David's alibi, his best proof that he didn't do that crime, is Boney's involment itself.Judge Aylsworth don't need a strancript of a trial that I've been manipulated by prosecutor ,he needs to see the truth.In fact there is two bad guys in this story ,Boney the evil killer and the prosecutor that won't admit he made a huge mistake.