« Alert: Narragansetts' sentencing delayed to Thursday | Today | Weather update: Thunderstorm, hail strike downtown »

June 17, 2008

Democrats file ethics complaint vs. Carcieri over hiring

PROVIDENCE -- State Democratic Party Chairman Bill Lynch said he filed a formal complaint with the state Ethics Commission today about the governor's hiring of his niece-in-law, a former campaign worker, in 2002.

Lynch's move came shortly after the ethics commission refused to give Carcieri an after-the-fact legal approval of the hiring and officials said the governor may have violated the Code of Ethics.

The ethics commission made its decision after a hearing this morning, and by early afternoon, Lynch, who had criticized the governor for the hiring, said he had filed a complaint.

Lynch said the ethics rules exist to keep elected officials from doing exactly what the governor did: "handing out taxpayer-funded positions as a reward for campaign work."

He predicted that the commission will agree with him that Carcieri "violated the spirit if not the letter of the ethics law."

Lynch also questioned the governor's replacing the commission's longtime chairman, James Lynch Sr., with a former unsuccessful Republican legislative candidate, Edward A. Magro, who arrived on the commission just in time for today's meeting on the hiring.

-- Journal staff writer Bruce Landis

The Providence Journal reported in January 2003, that one of Governor-elect Carcieri’s first hires was Stephanie Accaputo, the daughter of his wife’s brother and a worker in the governor's successful campaign in 2002. Accaputo's employment resurfaced as an issue recently when WJAR-TV (Channel 10) reported on it.

Carcieri's legal counsel, Kernan F. King, told the commission today that the hiring was proper under the Code of Ethics as it read at the time, in part because the code didn't include "niece-in-law" among the relatives covered by the code's anti-nepotism provisions.

"What part of 'by marriage' don't you understand?" retorted commission member Ross Cheit.

He was referring to the fact that the code had since 1991 prohibited officials from using their office to benefit relatives, "whether by blood, marriage or adoption," and listed nieces among the relatives covered.

King also argued that the ethics code at the time was so unclear that it didn't give officials fair notice of what they were prohibited from doing.

Commission lawyer Jason Gramitt said that although "the Code of Ethics prohibits taking official action to benefit one's niece," discovering that prohibition at the time could have required reading three sections of the code.

As a result, he said in a memo to the commission, officials "may not have been put on sufficient notice" about the implications to accuse them of violating the code.

But the fact that the governor or his staff might have had trouble understanding the anti-nepotism provisions in 2002 only prompted questions about why, if the administration found the Code of Ethics unclear, it didn't ask the commission for a clarifying legal opinion then.

To now ask for a legal opinion "going back to bail him out on this is not appropriate," Cheit said.

"I'm afraid we're going to end up with a complaint" against the governor, said commission member Richard Kirby.

The commission's new chair, Barbara Binder, came close to inviting a complaint, saying that "It would really help us home in on the issues" by "having other parties" involved in helping clarify the question.

Binder was elected chair of the commission today, replacing James Lynch Sr, whom Carcieri replaced on the board.

Accaputo was hired in late 2002 to work in the governor’s constituent-affairs office at a salary of $37,781 per year, and now makes $52,119 as an "administrative support specialist" in the executive department.

Asked about the hiring by the Journal then, Carcieri's press secretary, Jeff Neal, said that Accaputo had "very clearly earned" the job by providing "glowing service" during 14 months she working Carcieri's election campaign.

The commission urges public officials who worry about possible ethics violations to ask for formal advisory opinions ahead of time. The result may be approval, which shield officials against future prosecution, or a warning. Carcieri was asking approval for hiring his relative after the fact, which the commission wouldn't give.

Posted by Jack Perry  at 3:17 PM | Permalink

Comments

What, we have nothing better to do? How about cleaning up the corruption in the Democrat party in this state? Lynch should start there instead because he has a lot of work to do.

Mikki | June 18, 2008 6:40 AM link

Post a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

ADVERTISING



ProJo 7 to 7
May « Jun 2008 »
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Archived headlines

Archived
ProJo 9 to 5 News Blog
Oct 2005 - March 2006