« Carcieri nominates ex-Warwick fire chief as fire marshal |
Today
| Health Dept: R.I. tops for flu vaccination in older adults »
June 17, 2008
Carcieri urges elimination of straight-party voting
PROVIDENCE – Surrounded by GOP lawmakers, Governor Carcieri today mounted an eleventh-hour appeal to the General Assembly’s Democratic leaders to eliminate the option of straight-party voting and require that voters produce a photo identification before they are allowed to vote.
At an afternoon press conference, Carcieri said the voter ID requirement would ensure “that voters are who they say they are’’ and elimination of the straight-ticket option would spur more “thoughtful’’ consideration of candidates in Rhode Island, where Democrats hold an overwhelming majority in the General Assembly and all top statewide offices except the governor’s office.
As one of only 17 states that still allow straight-party voting, Carcieri said eliminating this option “will encourage voters to do their homework, consider candidates more carefully, and make informed decisions. Doing away with straight ticket voting would give all candidates a fair chance.’’
In actuality, the bills don’t yet go that far.
They call for a non-binding referendum on eliminating the straight-party voting option, which supporters hope will put pressure on the Democrat-dominated General Assembly to act accordingly. A Voters First Advisory Commission also recommended putting straight-ticket voting to the public in a non-binding referendum.
Both bills have their critics outside the political sphere, however, and with this year’s legislative session nearing an end, possibly as early as Friday, neither has won the support of a legislative committee.
The Rhode Island chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union has led the campaign against voter ID on grounds that “these laws disenfranchise eligible voters, pose a particular burden on poor, elderly, disabled and minority voters, and divert attention from more serious problems facing the voting process -- all in an attempt to "fix" a largely non-existent problem of alleged voter impersonation.’’
-- Katherine Gregg, Journal State House bureau
Carcieri today said in his mind there is “no downside.’’ He said 25 other states already require some form of voter identification, and 17 of those require photo IDs.
But in letters to lawmakers and newspaper opinion pieces, ACLU director Steve Brown took issue with Secretary of State Ralph Mollis’s contention that the identification card he envisioned would be available for free because “the documentation a voter would need to prove one’s identity in the first place in order to obtain the card would not be free.’’
Posted by Andrea Panciera
at 4:16 PM | Permalink
Post a comment
Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.