« Operator killed after MBTA trains collide in Mass. | Today | Providence police to test-drive eco-friendly scooters »

May 29, 2008

CVS trial: Prosecution, defense make closing arguments

PROVIDENCE -- Closing arguments got under way in the CVS corruption trial this morning with a federal prosecutor laying out a trail of legislation, e-mails and memos -- proof, he said, that John R. "Jack" Kramer and Carlos Ortiz, former CVS executives, are guilty of criminal wrongdoing.

During an hour-long closing, prosecutor Stephen G. Dambruch built his case around the actions and hiring of ex-state Sen John A. Celona, the government's star witness. Celona was hired as a $1,000-a-month consultant for the Woonsocket-based drugstore giant in 2000.

Dambruch provided evidence that Celona reversed his position on pharmacy-choice legislation and became an eager advocate for CVS.

CVS had long opposed pharmacy-choice legislation, and Dambruch today quoted from a document in which Ortiz had said that if the legislation passed, it would cost CVS millions of dollars in sales.

Dambruch also suggested in his closing that Kramer and Ortiz made repeated attempts to hide that Celona was a paid consultant. He pointed out that Ortiz told Todd Andrews, a former CVS corporate communications director, to keep Celona's consulting role quiet.

After a break this morning, David B. Fein, one of Kramer's lawyers, began his closing argument, telling the jurors they are probably wondering why they had to sit through three weeks of testimony. He said the government has not proved its case and there is no evidence of criminal intent by Kramer or Ortiz.

Fein said the hiring of Celona -- whether right or wrong -- should never have reached a courtroom.

"That discussion belongs in a corporate office in Woonsocket, Rhode Island, not a federal courtroom in Providence, Rhode Island," Fein told the jury.

After Fein, Thomas Kiley, a lawyer for Ortiz, will give a closing argument.

Dambruch will have the opportunity to offer a rebuttal.

Extra: More on this trial and the Operation Dollar Bill investigation corruption probe.

-- Journal staff writer W. Zachary Malinowski

Posted by Mike McKinney  at 11:30 AM | Permalink

Comments

I agree with Mr Fein. The prosecution had a weak case and a BAD star witness. Never should have gone this far. weak case, ruined some reputations and put peoples lives on hold.

Phil Gee | May 29, 2008 1:33 PM link

Not Guilty...by a mile!!!
The prosecution was hoping for a conviction so
that the next big case would go smoothly.
One problem... Celona was so weak that he repeatedly got himself caught up in mis-truths.

Kramer and Ortiz are only guilty of doing their jobs too well.

Not Guilty!!

pc | May 29, 2008 6:54 PM link

Post a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

ADVERTISING



ProJo 7 to 7
Apr « May 2008 »
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Archived headlines

Archived
ProJo 9 to 5 News Blog
Oct 2005 - March 2006