« Update: Fire in vacant house called suspicious / Photo |
Today
| Tonight: Rapper Akon at Ryan Center »
April 28, 2008
Economists: R.I. 'picture of weakness' in Northeast
PROVIDENCE -- Rhode Island stands alone as the only Northeastern state “in recession,” according to economists who reported today that the state’s economy hasn’t been this bad in nearly two decades.
The Ocean State’s employment figures, its foreclosure rates, and personal income growth are worse than its neighbors and national averages.
Rhode Island is one of just nine states in recession -- the next closest is Ohio -- while Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Connecticut have growing economies, according to Steve Cochrane, senior managing director for Economy.com, which is owned by Moody’s Investors Service.
“Clearly, in the northeast, Rhode Island is a picture of weakness,” Cochrane said.
The somber news was delivered today in a State House committee room where a dozen budget analysts will convene for the next two weeks to pour through tax receipts, economic trends and state expenditures. The bi-annual event -- dubbed the Revenue & Caseload Estimating Conference -- is more important than the empty chairs in the audience would suggest.
Especially this year.
The governor’s budget office has projected a $384-million deficit for the fiscal year that begins in July, based on data collected the last time the budget analysts gathered in the fall. A growing chorus of state leaders has suggested recently that the massive deficit is actually larger than $384 million.
The analysts who gather in Room 35 will decide in the next two weeks exactly how much larger.
-- Steve Peoples of the Journal State House Bureau
The Revenue & Caseload Estimating Conference always begins with economic forecasts, because the regional economy has a direct impact on the state’s primary sources of money: income taxes, sales taxes, business taxes and lottery receipts.
Cochrane, of Moody’s, was joined today by economists from the international consulting firm Global Insight.
“Without a doubt, it was a very poor year for the Rhode Island economy,” Michael Lynch, of Global Insight, told the panel of budget analysts, who represented the House, Senate and the governor’s budget office.
Rhode Island was the only New England state to report negative employment growth between March 2007 and March 2008, Lynch said. The state’s unemployment rate grew to 6.1 percent as Rhode Island lost 7,200 jobs in the third quarter of 2007 alone.
Personal income growth in Rhode Island increased by 4.8 percent, but fell short of the national average of 6.2 percent.
And Rhode Island’s foreclosure rate was among the worst in the nation, according to Lynch. Approximately 2.4 percent of all home loans were in foreclosure in the fourth quarter of last year, which was the 7th highest rate nationally.
State officials expected today’s outlook to be bad. But they didn’t expect Rhode Island to be singled out as worse than its neighbors.
“I am disappointed that it’s looking like we’re kind of an outlier in terms of how bad it is in Rhode Island,” state budget officer Rosemary Booth Gallogly said. “I expected that this would be a recession that hit all of New England. It looks like we’re in worse shape.”
Why did Rhode Island fare so poorly, given that most of the country has been hurt by the subprime mortgage crisis and subsequent credit crunch?
Cochrane cited these primary factors:
Rhode Island is losing population at a rate that he likened to the exodus in Silicon Valley after the dot-com bust. People returned to Silicon Valley, he said. But there’s no evidence to suggest that Rhode Island will soon increase its pool of potential taxpayers and consumers.
Rhode Island’s size is also working against it, according to Cochrane. Most larger states have several metropolitan areas; when one area struggles, another may be doing well. On average, therefore, the state may show growth.
Rhode Island, however, is essentially just one metropolitan area, he said.
The economists had varying estimates for how long Rhode Island’s recession may last, but agreed that a slow recovery may begin at the end of 2008 into 2009. But even those predictions were based on major assumptions, such as lower oil prices and improving confidence among consumers and the business community.
State budget officer Gallogly said the good news, if there was any today, was that the economists suggested that a full recovery in state employment may require five years, compared to the 10-year recovery that followed the recession of the early 1990s.
Posted by Mike McKinney
at 5:40 PM | Permalink
dennis | April 28, 2008 6:38 PM link
unclestu | April 28, 2008 8:01 PM link
Bill Anderson | April 28, 2008 8:57 PM link
Bill Anderson | April 28, 2008 8:58 PM link
amusing | April 28, 2008 9:52 PM link
Richard A. Mottola | April 28, 2008 11:29 PM link
Priscilla Hampton | April 29, 2008 4:14 AM link
Peter | April 29, 2008 5:35 AM link
Mark McGinn | April 29, 2008 7:05 AM link
Henry | April 29, 2008 9:22 AM link
Post a comment
Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.
Do you suppose there is any chance our elected officials would consider cutting taxes to spur the economy?
It seems pretty clear to me that the high tax burden in RI is driving population out of our state and crippling our economy.
Tax cuts could stop the exodus, spur the economy and likely lead to higher tax reciepts.
Too bad the clowns on Capitol Hill cannot seem to understand this concept.