« Murphy's Law: All pols deserve to be roasted | Today | Van Halen's Providence show rescheduled to May 25 »

March 17, 2008

Bear Stearns fallout rippling through R.I.

The collapse this weekend of Wall Street investment bank Bear Stearns will send ripples across the Rhode Island economy, according to two New England business experts interviewed yesterday.

“The easiest way to envision it, it’s kind of like a spider web,” said Mark M. Higgins, dean of the College of Business Administration at the University of Rhode Island. “What happens with one piece of the economy will have an effect on somebody else.”

The collapse will make it harder to buy a car, pay off credit cards and finance a college education, according to Higgins and Augustine Faucher, director of macroeconomics at Moody’s Economy.com.

“It’s gotten a lot more difficult to get a loan nowadays,” said Faucher.

The problem is what economic experts refer to as “credit tightening.” Bear Stearns was pulled under by heavy investments in the mortgage industry, which has been strained by soaring foreclosures, especially on sub-prime loans that borrowers can no longer afford.

In part, concern isn’t for the failing loans at Bear Stearns, because they have already done their damage. “There’s a lot of bad debt out there,” said Faucher. “The problem is we don’t know who’s holding it.”

-- Journal staff writer Paul Edward Parker

That uncertainty has made banks much more cautious in lending, both to consumers and to each other. Banks carrying bad debt don’t want to take on more that they might not be able to cover, and banks are wary of lending to each other, in case the borrower bank collapses as Bear Stearns did.

And Higgins said the fallout will extend beyond the web of banking interests. Everyday people whose money was — directly or indirectly — invested in Bear Stearns, will now find themselves crunched for cash. That could lead to further problems with bad mortgages, which could spiral into more difficulty for banks.

The collapse has other indirect effects, he said. “People forget there’s people working for Bear Stearns. Everybody thinks of this as a corporation ... but it’s a person, it’s the employees of the entity.” Those people could find themselves out of a job or taking home substantially less pay.

And, Higgins said, Bear Stearns had a policy requiring employees to donate 4 percent of their earnings to charity. That is money the charities count on, but now may not receive.

Also, as mortgages are harder to come by, fewer people buy houses and house prices decline. This, Faucher said, leads to homeowners being less willing to spend money as their home becomes worth less, creating more drag on the economy. “Consumers are cutting back already.”

The long-term effects of the Bear Stearns collapse will be psychological, as well as financial, said Higgins. He said steps must also be taken — by the financial community or the government — to demonstrate either that Bear Stearns was a fluke or that steps have been taken to prevent the same thing from happening again.

“No one will have any confidence, and a lot of what happens with the stock market is based on confidence.”

While both agreed the economy is in recession, they offered slightly different forecasts for where it is headed. "I can’t foresee coming out of this before the fall,” said Higgins.

“If things continue along this path, it’s going to be a pretty severe recession,” Faucher said, but added that he expects the federal government will take steps to shore up the economy, such as buying mortgage-backed securities to limit potential private losses. If that is the case, he said, “we think the recession is going to be pretty shallow and only last through the first half of 2008.”

And they agreed on the key step consumers can take to ride out the recession. Said Higgins, “You want to stay out of debt.” Said Faucher, “People have got to watch what they’re doing.”

Posted by Karen Bordeleau  at 5:30 PM | Permalink

Comments

Please spare us the impact of the Bear Stearns collapse/ bailout on charity...how ludicrous to even bring that aspect up. AND, sorry Bear Stearns is not a 'person', it's a legal entity known as a 'corporation'that has the rights of a person (to all our detriment).

Cal | March 17, 2008 11:46 PM link

IT ALL COMES DOWN TO THIS: OIL, OIL, OIL....

Ernie | March 18, 2008 5:18 AM link

Bush vetoed a bill that would have insured the health of millions of children for 6 billion. But we have 200 billion to bailout the super-wealthy at Bear Stearns. Where's the outrage?

Cal is correct. "Corporate personhood" needs to be corrected. Corporations should not have the rights of individuals. It's sick.

dave | March 18, 2008 7:05 AM link

Corporations do not have the same rights as individuals. Corporations have what is called limited liability, meaning that if the corporation commits a wrongful act (e.g. products liability), the corporation's liability is limited to its equity. Depending on the capitalization of a corporation, a corporations's liablity may be minimal. In contrast, if you are I were to commit a wrongful act (a tort such as battery) we can have personal assets (e.g. real estate) attached if there is a judgment against us. Nevertheless, Bear Stearns was handing out millions in bonuses to its employees while handing out easy credit to homebuyers across the country. Somehow we are supposed to feel bad for what has amounted to fraud?

mike | March 18, 2008 12:57 PM link

Post a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

ADVERTISING



ProJo 7 to 7
Feb « Mar 2008 » Apr
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Archived headlines

Archived
ProJo 9 to 5 News Blog
Oct 2005 - March 2006