« Man convicted in Latin Kings sweep heads back to jail | Today | Man pleads not guilty in Coventry ATV fatality »

March 7, 2008

Landmark's cardiac-surgery program under fiscal review

The state Health Department is stepping in to review Landmark Medical Center’s cardiac-surgery program amid fears that the three-year-old program is jeopardizing the hospital’s financial survival because it has never attracted enough patients.

Under conditions set by the state when the program was approved, Landmark is required to perform 500 heart surgeries a year by its third year of operation. The program’s third anniversary is in May, but in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, 2007, the hospital had done only about 100 surgeries, said Dr. David R. Gifford, health director.

It’s unlikely that the hospital can reach the standard within the next few weeks, Gifford said this morning. He described the expensive program as a drain on the Woonsocket hospital, which has been teetering financially for years but provides services surrounding community needs, such as cancer care and outpatient surgery. Landmark has virtually no endowment and can’t sustain such losses, he said.

The volume standards were set to ensure that doctors’ maintain their skill levels, but Gifford said this morning that his primary worry is financial.

“This is not a quality issue,” Gifford said. “Our concern is making sure we preserve the hospital. I am concerned that this could be threatening the hospital.”

Landmark spokesman Bill Fischer said that the heart surgery program was only “one minor variable” in the hospital’s financial woes. He said Landmark projects a net loss of only $300,000 from the cardiac surgery program in the current fiscal year. Last year, he said, the hospital lost $7 million – the same amount of money it spent on uncompensated care. He said low reimbursements and free care for the poor are the main factors driving the fiscal crisis at Landmark and other community hospitals.

“The quality of care we deliver through the cardiac program is extremely high,” Fischer said.

Landmark’s program, done in collaboration with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, in Boston, was created with the expectation that patients from central Massachusetts would be drawn to Woonsocket and that an aging population would have growing heart-surgery needs. But the Massachusetts patients apparently did not come to Landmark, and nationally cardiac surgery is on the decline, because more patients are undergoing angioplasty instead.

-- Journal medical writer Felice J. Freyer

Posted by Andrea Panciera  at 12:04 PM | Permalink

Comments

When are we finally going to start realizing that there need to be regional centers of excellence for some diseases and conditions? Landmark having their own cardiac program was disingenous from the begining. Those who need these procedures already have enough facilities both in Rhode Island and Massachusetts to handle these types of procedures. And don't give me the "they won't drive" excuse. They'll drive to Lincoln and Foxwoods, they'll drive to Miriam.

mary | March 7, 2008 2:00 PM link

Isn't it good news that research is changing the number of people needing open heart surgery? And aren't the "numbers down", too, at RI Hospital & The Miriam? Competition, if you can call it that, breeds better quality. The little engine that could - Landmark - is a formidable foe for the giant, Lifespan. Of course Lifespan would want to squish it like a bug. The Dept. of Health should strongly support this program - it is raising the bar of quality in RI - and no one thinks it is responsible for the financial woes of a small community hospital - it is experiencing exactly what every community hospital is experiencing without open heart surgery to point a finger at for the reason why. If the Health Dept. wants to help "the people" then it should support the people of northern RI and the great cardiac program at Landmark, and push the giant in Providence to improve their outcomes.

Dan | March 7, 2008 5:27 PM link

My understanding is that the providence hospitals have been performing these procedures for many years and are proficient. Travel should also never be an issue, 20 minutes on route 146 will bring the ill patient to Providence with very quick response. So i think this needs to be addressed seriously for the best care of the patient.

Jen | March 7, 2008 5:51 PM link

I always had a poor impression of Landmark UNTIL I had to use the emergency room at Miriam Hospital and Miriam misdiagnosed my problem as a "bad stomach ache".
In agony and in severe pain, I went to Landmark which, within minutes, realized I needed emergency surgery to remove my gall bladder.
The quality of care I got at Landmark was FAR SUPERIOR to the care I got at Miriam.
The State has conspired with Blue Cross to not properly re-imburse Landlark for medical bills, hence the Hospital has problems.
Shame on Blue Cross.

Bob North Smithfield | March 7, 2008 11:49 PM link

The Cardiac Program was a disaster from the beginning that gutted the Surgery Department first and then acted as a drain on the entire hospital. The hospital leadership ran roughshod over its own by-laws in setting up the Program and stroking its putative chair. The CEO and CFO of Landmark are a disgrace and solely to blame for the hospital's exodus of personnel. They took a first rate regional facility and turned it into a dying institution.

joe shlabotnik | March 8, 2008 6:15 AM link

I have been a traveling nurse for several years and during that time I have traveled nation wide, working in Cardiac Operating Rooms at some of the most prestigious hospitals in the country. I recently had the privilege to work with the Cardiac team at Landmark Medical Center. I was on assignment there for six months and during that time I was constantly impressed with the level of care that cardiac patients at Landmark received; both in the Cardiac Operating Room and in the CVICU. Landmark is the smallest program that I have ever worked at. It is also among the best. Although the number of surgeries is down (this is a national trend at programs both large and small)the surgical outcomes are impressive for a program of any size. If people are going to look at numbers, please be sure to look at them all. It is easy to point out that one can drive a short distance in any direction for cardiac care- I think that the biggest question that one should ask themselves is what kind of care? Landmark's heart program is a group of well trained professionals who are giving the community amazing care. Landmark may be in the red from a fiscal standpoint but do not for one second question the quality of care given at Landmark everyday...it can compete with any heart program in the country.

Cheri | March 10, 2008 9:56 PM link

Post a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

ADVERTISING



ProJo 7 to 7
Feb « Mar 2008 » Apr
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Archived headlines

Archived
ProJo 9 to 5 News Blog
Oct 2005 - March 2006