« Suspect in Somerset stabbing held pending hearing | Today | Photo: Shoes call attention to plight of the homeless »

March 13, 2008

Update: Acela in Providence hits 3 workers, killing 1

amtrakfatal.jpg
Journal photo / Mary Murphy
A state Medical Examiners official and police and fire officials look on as the scene of the fatal Amtrak crash is being investigated this afternoon.

PROVIDENCE -- One person has been killed, and two others seriously injured after they were struck early this afternoon by an Amtrak Acela train heading north to Boston from Providence.

Two of them were Amtrak employees; the third was a contractor. All three were at work inspecting tracks when they were hit at about 1:15 p.m., an Amtrak spokesperson Tracy Connell said shortly after 3 p.m. She could not say if they were male or female.

The two who were hurt have been taken to a hospital, but Connell did not know which one.

No one on board the train was hurt, she said, and passengers remained on the train. According to Connell, there were 162 passengers on board and six crew members.

Although the incident drew Amtrak police, city police and and fire and rescue workers, state Medical Examiners Office staff and even Mayor David N. Cicilline, no one on the scene would talk about how the accident happened. Amtrak police are leading the investigation.

Late this afternoon, Amtrak in a statement did say that the high-speed express train was going below the 55 mph limit authorized on that stretch of track.

Amtrak service in the area going in both directions was halted for about 2 1/2 hours while the Acela stayed on the tracks just north of the Providence rail station, where the Acela routinely makes stops.

At 3:48 p.m. service was resumed, Amtrak said in the statement sent at 4:15 p.m. The train, No. 2154, was also released and continued on to Boston. Some residual delays are expected into the evening. Check here for Amtrak schedules and train status.

MTBA service continued to operate between nearby South Attleboro, Mass., and Boston.

The train had been on the tracks just north of the Providence rail station, between Cadillac Lounge located 361 Charles St., which is near the main Post Office building, and an office building for Gastroenterology Associates at 44 West River St. on the other side.

It was passing through a stretch of track bounded on both sides by sloping ground leading up to a chain-link fence. When it came to a stop, part of the train had passed under the Charles Street overpass, where the corridor narrows.

-- With reports from projo.com staff writer Michael McKinney and Journal photographer Mary Murphy

At one point a crowd of about 40 to 45 people, including members of the press, watched the scene from the overpass.

A green tarp was placed over part of the side of the sixth or seventh car from the train's front while rescue personnel worked to remove the person who had been killed from underneath.

They emerged with an orange stretcher carrying remains covered in a white sheet.Firefighters carried the stretcher alongside the train, up the slope, placed it on a guerney and then wheeled it into the waiting Medical Examiners' truck.

Posted by Andrea Panciera  at 6:52 PM | Permalink

Comments

What I do not understand, why Amtrak did not inform those workers that the train was heading there way. I think Amtrak is responsible for the incident. Communication was a big factor here.....

jessica | March 13, 2008 4:27 PM link

I cannot agree more. How can those people have been on the tracks at the time the train was coming through? This is total negligence on the part of Amtrak! My prayers are with the families of the victims for sure.

Jim | March 13, 2008 4:56 PM link

Gee, Jess. You might want to have some info and facts out there before you assign blame.

Sherman | March 13, 2008 5:01 PM link

Wow, what a rush to judge without any concrete facts! You might want to think before you open your big yap!

Dan | March 13, 2008 5:31 PM link

I agree that more information is required. The report was lacking in a lot of facts and I don't think we can just assume anything based on a news account. Of course, here's hoping that everyone and every agency or company involved will, of course, do the right thing and accept responsibility if an error was made. No cover ups, please!

sharon | March 13, 2008 5:54 PM link

The driver of the train should have been watching for people in the tracks.

Eric | March 13, 2008 6:01 PM link

I am not sure I understand why you people are focusing on cover-ups and not my friend of over 20 years. He was one of the safest people I know. He knew as we all do in the railroad industry that if you make a mistake people can get hurt or killed. I will miss him dearly.

Al | March 13, 2008 6:33 PM link

I did work for a tree service company in New Jersey & worked along side of the tracks. While we were there working a repsentative from the train company had to be there at all times & sound a horn when a train approached so we could get further away from the tracks. Mostly he would let us know ahead of time. I'm inclined to think that Amtrak will have some repercussions later on.

Mike | March 13, 2008 7:03 PM link

Eric, I assume you have never been in a locomotive cab. Yes, the engineer is constantly on the look out for hazards. The train was doing only 55 MPH, you cannot stop it on a dime.
Amtrak, the Federal Government have rules that govern the protection of track workers.
Somehow someone(s) did not observe them. It takes time to make a full investigation. Tapes of radio and phone conversations have to be listened to; the locomotive "back box" has to be checked out, employees have to be interviewed and drug tested. The paper records will be checked out as well computer records. All of this is done by Federal Railroad Administration. Federal & State Departments of Transportation, railroad police, and the carrier's safety department.
Eric, all railroads place the responsibility of safety of any worker on a track upon that person.
Based on my experience, I have an idea what happended, but only time will tell who failed. I know that it wasn't the engineer.

Ben | March 13, 2008 7:31 PM link

I think everyone should just pray for the victims!! No one know for sure what has happened yet. I know one of the men hit and he is hurt very badly. My heart goes out to the family that has lost a loved one. Pray for his family and pray for the other 2 men that were hurt!

Maryann Longo | March 13, 2008 10:15 PM link

Have you ever been standing waiting for the train when the Acela comes barreling through?
There is not need for that train to come through a station at such a high speed.
Where was the communication? This is sick and preventable.

Susan | March 13, 2008 10:20 PM link

I just dont understand it. In a world of bus 'monitors'who check the street, and look under the tires (even if just one kid is getting off),and pot hole,or phone co. workers with 'flaggers' ,,how this kind of thing can happen. like that guy said .. in NJ, a train company person stood sentry,as tree work was done. Thats a VERY prudent measure. New rule: if men have to work on a track, Amtrak has to have a 'watcher'. Perhaps they already have such a rule, if so.. it was ignored.

jack | March 13, 2008 11:12 PM link

I KNOW ONE OF THESE GUYS AND I HOPE THAT HE IS DOING OKAY.. SO MY HEART GOES OUT TO ALL OF THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS & FRIENDS..
GOD BLESS YOU MY FRIEND..

Patti | March 13, 2008 11:34 PM link

hey so I was supposed to get on one of those trains leaving boston south station, and i am seriously wondering how this happened.because they say it wasnt suicide. they were working on the tracks. at all the train stops ive been to, they give you a warning well before we can even see or hear the train, and they didnt do that this time? And even if not, I personally hear the trains horns or whatever, bells, making noise, and can see it like more than 100 feet away, those trains are crazy fast, but they said it was going slower than usual, so even more time, to jump and run out the way right? I am not assigning anyone the blame, i am just wondering how it all happened. also i hope the two injured heal soon, and im praying for the family of the one who was killed. i am aware that not everyone can see or hear the same as i, even though Im near sighted, so idk. this is tragic, and i am trying to understand it.

Camila | March 14, 2008 12:17 AM link

Obviously, someone is in the wrong here. My first inclination is to put at least some of the blame on Amtrak. They are the one's who send these people out to inspect these tracks. They didn't know these people were out there I highly doubt it.

Secondly, they should have had some kind of warning system in place to inform them that a train was coming.

Amtrak will definetly be partly responsible for this tragedy.

Tim Carpenter | March 14, 2008 7:21 AM link

"Have you ever been standing waiting for the train when the Acela comes barreling through?
There is not need for that train to come through a station at such a high speed.
Where was the communication? This is sick and preventable"

Susan, I must comment on your posting first before I make my own comments. First of all, any station that the Acella does not stop at means that the train will continue through the station. They may rreduce speed some, but if every train slowed down to pass every station they were not stopping at, then they might as well stop there. my point is Susan, the trains blow their horns, they have anouncements IN ADVANCE of the train going by the station stating "Train approaching, please stay behind the yellow line". Your statment that "there is no reason the train should come through the station at such a high speed" is not logical and is also not relevent here. The issue at hand is how did the workers get injured. The dispatcher is made aware of when the workers are on or near the tracks doing their job. The railroad has supervisors/foremen on site with radios and in most cases, the upcoming train must call the on scene supervisor and request permission to enter the work area. Additionally, all train crews receive train orders indication work zones or "slow orders" which tell the train that between these 2 points, there is work going on and your speed should be designated as_ _ mph and once you pass that area, you may resume speed. So what happened? I would agree with posters who state that it will be shared responsibility. It could be that the train was early, it could be that the track workers were not in the area where they should have been. it could also be something else completely different. the bottom line is that work is done on railroad track that is alot busier and more dangerous then this stretch in Providence. It will be determined what happened, and what needs to be corrected or changed to prevent that from happening again. It is a very unfortate accident and believe me it takes quite a traumatic toll on the locomotive operator also. We will find out what happened. it just may take time.. please pray for the victims and their families and be patient...

Rod | March 14, 2008 1:37 PM link

Post a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

ADVERTISING



ProJo 7 to 7
Feb « Mar 2008 » Apr
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Archived headlines

Archived
ProJo 9 to 5 News Blog
Oct 2005 - March 2006