« Generosity that came with makeover was extreme, too | Today | Tonight: Debate watches or Superstar at PPAC »

February 26, 2008

Update: Prospective jurors for smoke-shop trial grilled

PROVIDENCE -- Prospective jurors in the trial of the seven Narragansett Indians accused of resisting and fighting with state police during the 2003 smoke-shop raid were barraged today with questions ranging from their thoughts on smoking to their opinions about casino gambling.

Prosecutors and defense lawyers are trying to pick a jury for the estimated month-long trial in Providence County Superior Court, and today the state got its first chance to question those who might end up hearing the case.

Special Assistant Attorney General Maria Deaton asked the 16 people seated, at least temporarily, about their thoughts on cigarettes, whether they had strong opinions about casino gambling or had participated in rallies or given money to the cause.

A court spokesman earlier today said the judge excused jurors this morning who could not attend what could be a month-long trial

Seven Narragansett Indians, including Chief Sachem Matthew Thomas, face misdemeanor charges related to the state police raid on a tribal smoke shop that grew violent in July 2003.

-- Journal staff writer Katie Mulvaney, with Associated Press reports

And while the case is not about the tribe’s efforts to get a casino, Deaton and Judge Susan E. McGuirl asked prospective jurors whether their views on gaming would impair their ability to consider the case with an open mind. The Narragansetts have sought to open a casino, or other gaming venture, in Rhode Island for approaching two decades.

McGuirl broadened the inquiry to touch on thoughts about Native Americans, in general, and the Narragansett Indian tribe specifically.

Likewise, Deaton quizzed those seated about their past interactions with police and their reflections on being stopped for speeding. Had they or their relatives been charged with or the victim of a crime?

Prosecutors will continue their questioning this morning, with the defense to follow. The lawyers will then be able select which jurors they’d like to go or stay.

Posted by Mike McKinney  at 6:44 PM | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

ADVERTISING



ProJo 7 to 7
Jan « Feb 2008 » Mar
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Archived headlines

Archived
ProJo 9 to 5 News Blog
Oct 2005 - March 2006