« Senate committee slated to get update on fire codes |
Today
| Cicilline to meet with Federal Hill residents »
January 16, 2008
Update: Carcieri plan would up retirement age
Governor Carcieri this morning proposed a set of sweeping reforms aimed at bringing property tax relief to Rhode Island communities.
The plan calls for all cities and towns that are not keeping up with contributions to their self-administered pension plans move all new employees to the state Municipal Employees Retirement System. It would also institute a minimum retirement age of 59 for nonvested municipal workers in the state’s system to make them consistent with teachers and state employees.
The proposal further calls for extending the property tax cap that now applies to all cities and towns to local fire districts, thus capping the amount these districts are allowed to raise taxes in communities that depend on fire districts.
It also recommends fixing state payments to towns and cities for properties exempt from the tax rolls.
To help eliminate the guess work that can go into local financial planning, the proposal would also allow municipalities the option of delaying the start of their fiscal year to October. That move would give cities and towns time to consider the enacted state budget – and specifically the local aid packages – before having to pass their own budgets for the coming year.
Carcieri’s proposal would also require that all new collective bargaining agreements be filed with the state – either with the Division of Property Valuation and Municipal Finance or the Department of Education – within a month of reaching a final labor agreement. It’s a proposal that Carcieri calls “a giant leap forward toward open government.”
Finally, the proposed legislation calls for a study of property tax classifications and exemption plans in cities and towns across the state with the goal of streamlining the offerings and making property taxes more equitable throughout the state.
In a joint press conference with Gary Sasse, the director of the newly created Department of Revenue, the governor called the proposals “pieces of a mosaic” that will help get local spending under control at a time when the state is trying to reign in its own spending in face of a growing deficit.
“We won’t [be able] to address the state’s problems if cities and towns are in a weak fiscal position,” Sasse said.
Each of the above proposals – submitted as one legislative bill – would need General Assembly approval. House Republicans said they intend to submit the legislation sometime this week.
-- Journal State House reporter Cynthia Needham
Posted by Jack Perry
at 1:02 PM | Permalink
Concerned Person | January 16, 2008 2:41 PM link
Greg | January 16, 2008 2:53 PM link
Frank Martin | January 16, 2008 2:58 PM link
Melissa | January 16, 2008 3:17 PM link
Realistc Citizen | January 16, 2008 4:31 PM link
Taxpayer | January 16, 2008 4:44 PM link
Oldman | January 16, 2008 5:16 PM link
Dave from Ashaway | January 16, 2008 5:47 PM link
Joanne | January 16, 2008 6:27 PM link
mike | January 16, 2008 8:49 PM link
Glen | January 16, 2008 10:37 PM link
David | January 16, 2008 10:46 PM link
wolf | January 17, 2008 7:04 AM link
rj | January 17, 2008 7:16 AM link
A High School Kid | March 25, 2008 9:49 PM link
Greg | March 26, 2008 8:30 AM link
Post a comment
Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.
Help me understand this. How will school departments know how much money can be allocated to schools, which begin in September, if we don't enact our own local budgets until October? How can they hire teachers if towns don't know how much money they will have? How about instead the state commits to level fund from previous year and then lifts the cap imposed by 3050 so towns can raise their own taxes to levels that the community is willing to support?????