« Judge dismisses charge against R.I. Guard general |
Today
| High court hears arguments on same-sex divorce »
October 9, 2007
R.I. delegation decries children's health care veto

Journal photo / Steve Szydlowski
Surrounded by photographs of adopted children, Sen. Jack Reed gets ready to speak out on President Bush's veto of the children's health program, at a press conference held at the Neighborhood Health Plan of Rhode Island today.
PROVIDENCE -- Rhode Island’s entire congressional delegation came out in force this morning to vehemently criticize President Bush’s veto of a bill which would have continued providing health care to millions of children.
Congress first passed the State Children’s Health Insurance Program in 1997 and it currently covers about 6 million children of families who earn too much to qualify for welfare but not enough to afford their own private health insurance.
In Rhode Island the program covers about 25,000 Rhode Islanders through the state’s Rite Care program for children, families and pregnant women.
At a morning news conference at the Neighborhood Health Plan of Rhode Island, U.S. Sens. Jack Reed and Sheldon Whitehouse and Congressmen Patrick Kennedy and James Langevin called Bush’s veto unconscionable and pledged to work to find the votes in Congress necessary to override the president’s veto.
The president is asking future generations to pay for the war in Iraq, said Reed; the least the country can do is help pay for their health insurance.
Video: This afternoon, President Bush is expected to promote his No Child Left Behind legislation. Support for its reauthorization has declined in the wake of his veto. Watch his Rose Garden press conference live starting at 2 p.m.
-- Journal staff writer Tom Mooney
Posted by Brandie Jefferson
at 11:43 AM | Permalink
Steven Van Eyk | October 9, 2007 3:25 PM link
Disgusted taxpayer | October 9, 2007 7:07 PM link
Madeleine | October 10, 2007 6:42 AM link
Craig | October 10, 2007 7:49 AM link
Patrick | October 10, 2007 10:22 AM link
Ginja | October 10, 2007 2:18 PM link
Jeanne | October 10, 2007 2:39 PM link
Jonna | October 10, 2007 8:37 PM link
Post a comment
Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.
What the RI delegation fails to tell the voters/taxpayers about the bill is this: That the intent of this bill is to extend gov't health care to families making 300% of the poverty level..61,900. And in places like New York to almost 83,000. Familes earning that level of income are squarly in the middle class, not the working poor who need the assistance. And if you have a "child" up to 25 yeasr old, they are covered. If this was such a good bill, why would there not be enough votes in the House and Senate to overturn the veto ?