« Judge dismisses charge against R.I. Guard general | Today | High court hears arguments on same-sex divorce »

October 9, 2007

R.I. delegation decries children's health care veto

reedonveto.jpg
Journal photo / Steve Szydlowski
Surrounded by photographs of adopted children, Sen. Jack Reed gets ready to speak out on President Bush's veto of the children's health program, at a press conference held at the Neighborhood Health Plan of Rhode Island today.


PROVIDENCE -- Rhode Island’s entire congressional delegation came out in force this morning to vehemently criticize President Bush’s veto of a bill which would have continued providing health care to millions of children.

Congress first passed the State Children’s Health Insurance Program in 1997 and it currently covers about 6 million children of families who earn too much to qualify for welfare but not enough to afford their own private health insurance.

In Rhode Island the program covers about 25,000 Rhode Islanders through the state’s Rite Care program for children, families and pregnant women.

At a morning news conference at the Neighborhood Health Plan of Rhode Island, U.S. Sens. Jack Reed and Sheldon Whitehouse and Congressmen Patrick Kennedy and James Langevin called Bush’s veto unconscionable and pledged to work to find the votes in Congress necessary to override the president’s veto.

The president is asking future generations to pay for the war in Iraq, said Reed; the least the country can do is help pay for their health insurance.

Video: This afternoon, President Bush is expected to promote his No Child Left Behind legislation. Support for its reauthorization has declined in the wake of his veto. Watch his Rose Garden press conference live starting at 2 p.m.

-- Journal staff writer Tom Mooney

Posted by Brandie Jefferson  at 11:43 AM | Permalink

Comments

What the RI delegation fails to tell the voters/taxpayers about the bill is this: That the intent of this bill is to extend gov't health care to families making 300% of the poverty level..61,900. And in places like New York to almost 83,000. Familes earning that level of income are squarly in the middle class, not the working poor who need the assistance. And if you have a "child" up to 25 yeasr old, they are covered. If this was such a good bill, why would there not be enough votes in the House and Senate to overturn the veto ?

Steven Van Eyk | October 9, 2007 3:25 PM link

they have no problem spending other people's (taxpayers) money for the "poor children". When do the "poor" working folks get a break? Why don't they ever decry any tax hikes that fund these entitlement programs for the "poor children & their families"???!!!! RI is a joke and so is the ENTIRE CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION AND the STATE LEGISLATORS!!!! Get me out of here.

Disgusted taxpayer | October 9, 2007 7:07 PM link

Everyone especially the CHILDREN of our State should be entitled to healthcare at a reasonable price or free. We are paying way to much for healthcare in Rhode Island and the doctors of Rhode Island are getting way to low of a reimbursement. Come on Rhode Island it's time to shape up and get with the times.

Madeleine | October 10, 2007 6:42 AM link

Bush is willing to spend billions upon billions for a criminal war, but opposes health care for children. It really is that simple. Kudos to the Delegation, and shame on Bush and anyone who agrees with this veto.

Craig | October 10, 2007 7:49 AM link

Keep spouting those Democrat talking points, Craig. Ignore the reality and keep spouting.

Patrick | October 10, 2007 10:22 AM link

Please, when can we vote these idiots out! This whole fiasco is disgusting! The President has done nothing wrong except to save the taxpayers money. Why should we extend (and pay for) health care coverage for children whose parents make $83,000 a year? Hello? This is what Bush vetoed. Our politicians would have us believe that poor kids are being kept from coverage which is not true. What is wrong with a family whose income is more than $5,000 a month that they can't afford health care? It's bad enough that working RI'ers have to pay through the nose to educate, house, and feed the increasing illegal immigrant population in this state, not to mention our own poor citizens who are already on aid; now our rich politicians (hello? Whitehouse, Reed & Kennedy??!!) want a break on health care for families whose income is $83,000 year. Are they nuts? Why don't we all just go socialist...afterall, this is what our politicians are trying to do to our society now.

Ginja | October 10, 2007 2:18 PM link

We're on the path to socialism. Just keep voting those Democrats into office and in no time at all, we'll all have free health care....and will die before we get an appointment to see the doctor. If you think that's overreacting, look what doleouts and entitlements have done to our emergency rooms already. It's called boarding where patients are kept on gurneys in the er until they die, because there's not enough support to take care of them. Social security benefits? Bush wanted to allow all of us a piece of the real action by privatizing, but the Dems voted that out in no short order? Why? Because the Dems don't believe we should have a piece of the action, something to call our own, taking responsibility for ourselves. No, dems want to take care of us themselves so privatization is out. And so are the funds of Social Security once the boomers clean it out. What the Dems really worry about is that they need money, and right now they're pulling money out of Social Security for their own ends. So Bush's idea of taking control of our own lives was nixed because Dems can't take away from us what they don't have access to. But that's okay people, you just keep on trucking with those Democrats and sooner or later, you won't have a pot to you know what in. Isn't it enough for your to realize what fools these are when you see our own politicians indicted or copping pleas? And look at this latest fiasco screaming that Bush is taking away from poor kids. Poor? Last time I looked, $61,000 annual income wasn't poor by a longshot. Anyone making that kind of money who can't afford health care is spending their money foolishly on other things.

Jeanne | October 10, 2007 2:39 PM link

This president (I can’t even capitalize the word as he gets not one iota of my respect) has consistently made one bad decision after another during his time in office. As a Republican that will no longer be voting my party ways, I am appalled and disgusted by his actions. Death and dismemberment along with billions to a civil war we have no business being in and our country going to hell in a hand basket with no health insurance for our people, foreclosures, 2 out of 3 people with not enough for retirement and probably no social security, the biggest deficit in years if ever and on and on. Nice job Mr. Bush!

For the first time in my 50 year life, I fear for the future of our people. Can our country be saved from the repercussions of your actions?

Jonna | October 10, 2007 8:37 PM link

Post a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

ADVERTISING



ProJo 7 to 7
Sep « Oct 2007 » Nov
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Archived headlines

Archived
ProJo 9 to 5 News Blog
Oct 2005 - March 2006