« Firefighters compete for kitchen bragging rights |
Today
| At the aquarium: My, what a toothy grin »
October 10, 2007
BIF-3: WSJ's Walter Mossberg

Co-host, WSJ columnist -- and Warwick native -- Walter Mossberg, right, is interviewing Jason Fried of 37 Signals, which makes Web-based software for businesses:
-- Basecamp collaboration tool -- messaging, scheduling, calendar.
-- Highrise -- customer relationship management tool that keeps track of conversations and next "things to do."
-- Backpack keep all your notes, photos and files together online
Mossberg compliments the wonderfully named, open-source* Ruby on Rails, a web development framework that helps in writing write web based applications.
"How come most of America is shackled to a piece of crap like Outlook?" asks Mossberg, to much laughter.
He's stealng the show here.
"Outlook was made by a small, smart team at Microsoft-- a combination of a PIM (personal information manager) and email in one product. (It was) sleek and small and clever and it just has become, I think, a sort of mess."
(Walt doesn't like Google's gmail either -- "I don't look to read mail like a conversation.")
He doesn't buy that Web-based software eludes the mess. "Different delivery model, but not a new service model. It's still subject to the pressure of feature creep."
"How do you balance the mantra of simplicity? (Have you tried to buy a clothes dryer lately -- it's like a 747.) ...the demands of a vocal set of customers who want more features?"
Fried: "You have to be Steve Jobs. You have to say no."
Mossberg agrees, quoting Jobs: "I'm prouder of the things we haven't done."
His best line: "People who write open-source sourceware would not know a normal consumer from a bag of Cheetos."
Fried agrees: "Customer experience is not the point of open source software."
*Open source: "Refers to software that is distributed with its source code so that end user organizations and vendors can modify it for their own purposes." The Firefox browser is open source, and most of the extensions written for it come as a result of someone writing a little tool for their own use and releasing it to everyone else.
Posted by Sheila Lennon
at 11:25 AM | Permalink
Charles Grams | October 12, 2007 10:51 AM link
Post a comment
Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.
Don't these Basecamp guys think there's need to upgrade their tool from time to time. "No new features" what kind of mantra is this? They don't seem to care for their customers. I use Wrike http://www.wrike.com/ instead of Basecamp. Wrike guys are always very responsive. I've recently asked them for a feature and they added it to their development plan. That means I can influence the software development, don't you agree? They want to do everything to keep their clients satisfied, that's why I stick with Wrike. BTW I get more space and features for less money, if to compare Basecamp and Wrike pricing.