« Take a walk on the IWay |
Today
| Changes at Channel 6 after sale »
October 11, 2007
Pension change: Short-term cost, long-term savings
PROVIDENCE -- Moving the state retirement system to a "defined contribution" would cost the state at least $151.5 million next year but lead to substantial savings in the long term, according to a study commissioned by the governor's office.
The state retirement board briefly discussed the study this morning, but members largely deferred comment to Governor Carcieri's office.
Both the governor and House Speaker William J. Murphy have endorsed a plan that would end the practice of lifetime pensions for all new employees. Murphy recently said he'd like to see a shift from the "defined benefit" system to a "defined contribution system," similar to a 401(k), enacted as soon as the coming legislative session.
The study was produced by the retirement board's actuary, Gabriel Roeder Smith & Company of Texas. It looks specifically at how much it would cost to freeze the pension system to new employees as of July 1, 2008.
With fewer employees paying into the state pension fund, there would be fewer dollars helping to cover pensions for existing employees and the state's unfunded liability. The change would require the state to pay an additional $151.5 million for the fiscal year that begins July 1, 2008, to make up the shortfall.
And it would cost taxpayers more than $520 million over the current system through 2015, according to the study. The projected costs do not take into account any potential state match for the 401(k) system.
However, the state would begin to see savings in 2016 under a defined contribution system, according to the study. Those savings would increase substantially from 2016 to 2029.
State budget officer Rosemary Gallogly said the study is an important first step in deciding whether or not to make a change. "We knew it wasn't going to be a slam dunk. We knew it wasn't going to be easy," she said this morning of the short-term costs.
The next step is to analyze some alternative proposals that the study suggested, but did not explore in detail. One option referenced this morning by State Treasurer Frank Caprio, for example, would allow the state to take out pension obligation bonds to help cover the short-term costs.
-- Steve Peoples, Journal State House Bureau
Posted by Steve Peoples
at 11:52 AM | Permalink
Nancy Nixon | October 11, 2007 12:28 PM link
Tony P | October 11, 2007 1:46 PM link
Tina | October 11, 2007 2:24 PM link
jim scotland | October 11, 2007 3:57 PM link
Problem solved | October 11, 2007 3:59 PM link
timinri | October 11, 2007 4:26 PM link
Pat Crowley | October 11, 2007 4:47 PM link
E | October 11, 2007 6:38 PM link
jim Scotland | October 11, 2007 8:01 PM link
lou | October 11, 2007 8:46 PM link
STEVE | October 11, 2007 8:48 PM link
kelly | October 12, 2007 2:25 AM link
Paula | October 12, 2007 3:21 AM link
Billy Bob | October 12, 2007 6:29 AM link
retiree | October 12, 2007 8:27 AM link
Neil | October 12, 2007 8:34 AM link
Post a comment
Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.
I have to say being a State Employee I agree with a plan like this rather than having a lot of people losing their jobs. We are losing job positions all over the state in private industry and now the Govenor is talking about laying off 1,000 state workers. Where will all of these people get other postions?