« Photo: Bluefish circle near courthouse | Today | DOT closing temporary Barrington span at night »

September 17, 2007

R.I. speaker, governor react to Mass. casino plans

Reacting to Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick's proposal today to license three Bay State resort casinos, Rhode Island House Speaker William Murphy said state lawmakers in January will have to take "another serious look" at whether to have table games up and running before Massachusetts does.

Murphy, a Democrat, spoke of the existing Twin River facility in Lincoln and the Newport Grand -- and perhaps looking at a third option.

"For the time being, both entities will survive. However, if three casinos go in Massachusetts, I think we will have some problems," he said, referring to the argument that casinos in neighboring states steal away dollars from Rhode Island.

But asked if Republican Governor Carcieri would propose table games, spokesman Jeff Neal said it was extremely unlikely.

'From a regional perspective, the casino industry has taken a divide and conquer approach to New England. The danger is once one New England state falls for that argument, all of the other New England states may be forced to take that same step," Neal said.

Two of the largest casinos in the country are being operated by Indian tribes in eastern Connecticut, while the Narragansetts continue to press for a casino in Rhode Island, where Governor Carcieri remains strongly opposed.

Patrick today proposed licensing three casinos in a move he said would generate between $400 million and $450 million in annual tax revenue that he would spend on transportation upgrades and property-tax relief.

Under the plan, the "tasteful and appropriate" casinos would be distributed one each in the western, southeastern and greater metropolitan Boston regions of the state, Patrick said. The licenses would be put up for bid in a competitive process open to Indian tribes and casino companies.

"Casino gambling is neither a cure-all nor the end of civilization," Patrick said. "On balance, however, and under certain conditions, I believe resort casinos can work well in, and for, the Commonwealth."

However, lawmakers must approve expanding legalized gambling beyond the state lottery and four racetracks, and House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi said he was not persuaded by Patrick's plan.

"So far, our concerns for ushering in casino gambling have not been eased," DiMasi said in a statement. "We in the House remain skeptical. But we will hear the governor out and we will be asking the governor to explain the rationale behind his conclusions.

"I will obviously be discussing this with members of the House, some of whom have serious and justified concerns about creating a casino culture here in the Commonwealth."

-- projo.com staff writer Michael P. McKinney and The Associated Press, with reports from Journal staff writer Paul Grimaldi

Gambling opponents already are mobilizing against the plan, arguing the casinos won't be the cash cow Patrick hopes and will end up costing the state money - primarily lottery revenues - while destroying its character.

"I didn't make this proposal without understanding that it's going to take some work to get it passed," Patrick said.

Patrick said the casinos would generate more than $2 billion annually in economic activity and create "good jobs at good wages." He said "tens of thousands" of construction jobs would be created to build the facilities.

"With that kind of economic benefit, we cannot reject the gaming industry out of hand," he said.

Patrick did not address how much money could be raised up front for the licenses, nor how long the licenses would last.

The governor said developing casino gambling in the state was part of his overall plan to advance initiatives that provide long-term sustainable growth for Massachusetts.

"Destination resort casinos can serve a useful role in our overall economic plan," he said.

Patrick is under pressure to find new revenues as the state looks for extra money to close an estimated $15-billion to $19-billion gap in transportation spending over the next 20 years.

"Our roads, rails, buses and bridges are showing the effect of over 16 years of neglect," the governor said.

Patrick also wants to spend the revenue to fulfill one of his campaign pledges to reduce property taxes, which he said he would do through tax credits.

The governor also has proposed big ticket items including a $1 billion, 10-year life-science project that would include the world's largest stem-cell bank and a $1.4 billion commuter rail line from Boston to Fall River and New Bedford.

He also said trust funds would be created to deal with public health issues linked to gambling and "community mitigation" -- to help towns offset the costs of hosting a casino.

DiMasi has opposed an expansion of gambling in the past. But in the weeks leading up to Patrick's announcement, the Boston Democrat said he would keep an open mind.

Massachusetts Senate President Therese Murray has said she supported expanded gambling.

Patrick's plan follows a proposal by the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe to build a $1 billion casino on land it owns in Middleborough. The tribe could either try to outbid others for one of the licenses proposed by Patrick, or continue along a more lengthy track to win federal approval that could result in a fourth casino in the state.

The governor said at least one of the licenses would have "a Native American component."

"I fully expect that we will give special weight to the tribe. I think they have a special role and interest," he said of the Mashpee Wampanoags.

"I just can't tell you whether that means reserving one of the licenses, or giving special weight to one or more of the licenses with the tribe as a partner," he said.

The Aquinnah Wampanoag Indians have declared that they would also open a casino if their Mashpee counterparts do the same.

Consumers spent $32 billion in commercial casinos in 11 states last year - more than consumer spending on specialty coffee and books combined, according to the American Gaming Association.

Posted by Mike McKinney  at 4:47 PM | Permalink

Comments

To little to late is the story of our state. We are just like the bottom of a toilet bowl, eventually we will all get sucked down.

Michael | September 17, 2007 6:21 PM link

Post a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

ADVERTISING



ProJo 7 to 7
Aug « Sep 2007 » Oct
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Archived headlines

Archived
ProJo 9 to 5 News Blog
Oct 2005 - March 2006