« Johnston school officer suspended without pay | Today | 43-year-old indicted for murdering sex partner »

December 12, 2006

Son's picture rejected by yearbook; mother, ACLU sue

The mother of a Portsmouth high school senior is suing the school department for rejecting a yearbook photo featuring the boy in a chain mail coat with a prop sword over his shoulder.

The student, Patrick Agin, is a member of the Society for Creative Anachronism, an international organization which reenacts medieval and Renaissance history.

The Rhode Island chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union filed the suit on behalf of Patrick's mother, claiming that the school is violating her son's freedom of speech by rejecting the photo, according to an announcement released today.

The ACLU is asking a Superior Court judge for a temporary restraining order preventing the school from printing the yearbook without Patrick's photo.

Portsmouth High School principal Robert Littlefield suggested earlier in the month that the photo would violate the school's "zero tolerance" policy banning weaponry.

In a letter sent to the principal last week, ACLU executive director Steven Brown criticized the school for its "cookie cutter" approach to education that punishes students "not for being bad, but for being different."

The letter cited an incident four years ago when Julie Cahill, another Portsmouth High School senior -- and a member of the National Honor Society, drama club and former class president -- was barred by school officials from participating in a mentoring program because she had purple hair and a nose ring.

Posted by Steve Peoples  at 12:50 PM | Permalink

Comments

i think if we permit behavior like this then let all other take a picture as a cowboy, policeman, firefighter, stripper,drag-queen etc its not a halloween party...the school has the rights to set standards....we couldnt wear hats in HS

Ksch | December 12, 2006 4:19 PM link

I'd like an explanation from the Principal as to how a photograph of a student holding a sword violates the school's 'zero tolerance' policy against weapons.

Are you going to tell me that there are no weapons shown in the history textbooks anymore? How is this photo worse than an image in a historical text showing a warrior in the same garb?

This is an easy win for the ACLU.

Greg | December 12, 2006 4:30 PM link

Is there a policy that dictates what is proper attire for a yearbook photo? For example is it spelled out that male students must wear a blazer jacket and tie? If yes then this kid violated it and the the Principal wins, if not then it's a slam dunk for the ACLU. But I do think the mother is acting a little irrational in this case. Is this really something to sue over? Is she setting a good example for her son? If you don't agree with something file a law suit? Wake up Mom and be a better parent.

JKW | December 13, 2006 9:00 AM link

Certainly gives free publicity to the Society for Creative Anachronism.

past alumni | December 13, 2006 9:07 AM link

How about they put a picture of a donkey in place of the medival one, the same point comes across.

picture | December 14, 2006 6:30 AM link

We left RI years ago. Our children attend school in a suburb outside of Rochester, NY. Our district had two high schools listed in Newsweek's "Top 100 High Schools" for the last several years. The middle school recently won a national award from the US Department of Education as being a "School to Watch" because of the educational curriculum, music, art and athletic programs available to sixth, seventh and eight grade students. Our high schools' yearbook committees have rules regarding senior graduation pictures. They are only allowed to use photographs by photographers (not personal photos). The student's photograph can be from the chest up only. They dress appropriately, not necessarily in suit and ties, but appropriately for a memorable book that makes you part of something larger than yourself and your mother. Our district suggests that if a family would like a casual photograph of their student, have one taken and display it in your home or your child's baby book. Why should this student and his mother have the right to impact the look of the entire yearbook and ruin the photographs of the senior class? Perhaps the students in Portsmouth should cancel their orders and refuse to financially back its publication.

Sandra Jeanne | December 14, 2006 12:34 PM link

I just viewed the Yearbook submission. Kudos to you for wanting to be different. I might ask was there any specs given to you before the picture was taken? I ask this because that was the arguement I gave when my senior wanted to put a full body shot black and white photo in SK's 2002 Year Book. My Other Son was lucky he went to Chariho They allowed a Teashirt( Metalica)... sunglass wearing half body pose. Our third chose a sit down eating milk and cookies in a 50's diner to express his School Spirit. This Is known as Creativity!!!

KrMarchetti | December 14, 2006 3:52 PM link

Post a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

ADVERTISING



ProJo 7 to 7
Nov « Dec 2006 » Jan
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Archived headlines

Archived
ProJo 9 to 5 News Blog
Oct 2005 - March 2006