« Update: Crash on Route 10 north has been cleared | Today | 3 killed when gunman opens fire in New Bedford club »

December 11, 2006

Chafee appears tonight on The Daily Show

The taping has begun for U.S. Sen. Lincoln Chafee’s appearance tonight on comedian Jon Stewart's The Daily Show.

Chafee was poised to begin the taping around 6 or 6:30 tonight for the popular show, which airs at 11 tonight, Comedy Central spokeswoman Renata Luczak said.

Stewart approached Chafee's office about being on the The Daily Show a day or two after Chafee wrote an op-ed piece that appeared in the New York Times on Nov. 12 -- five days after he was defeated by Democratic opponent Sheldon Whitehouse, Chafee spokesman Christopher Spina said.

"I think he really respects the senator and offered to have him on the show," Spina said.

If you're not up late enough to catch the show tonight, it will be re-broadcast tomorrow at 8 a.m., 2 p.m. and 8 p.m.

-- projo.com staff writer Steve Peoples, with reports from Journal staff writer Ed Fitzpatrick

Posted by Kate Bramson  at 7:06 PM | Permalink

Comments

I hope he doesn't let Chafee get away with his line that he is an independent man. http://www.pat-crowley.org/blog/?p=287

So Linc Chafee will be on the Daily Show with John Stewart tonight. I am sure Linc will talk about his independence, and how he stood up to his party, that he made a difference, and that it is a shame that his brand of republicanism is on the wane.

Well, I never really bought the independent man thing, and Chafee’s voting since the election seems to prove my point. According to the Washington Post’s really cool vote tracking program, there have been 16 votes in the Senate since the election. Chafee voted in 15 of them, and only once did he break with his party. And when he did, it was irrelevant because the measure he opposed passed despite his “No” vote.

Now, dear reader, these weren’t just fluff, end-of-the-term votes. These were issues regarding taxes, judicial appointments, and foreign policy. And on three amendments to the GOP effort to change the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to make it easier to sell nuclear technology to India, Chafee voted with his party to:

1. Deny that it is the policy of our country to support UN Resolution 1172, which calls for an end to the nuclear arms races between India and Pakistan;

2. Reject an amendment that would have called on India not to export nuclear technology to American enemies;

3. Reject an amendment that would have made it more difficult for India to provide military-to-military aid to Iran.

Now, I am not a foreign policy expert, but I think it is a good idea to restrict nuclear arms in the Subcontinent, stop the exporting of nuclear technology, and, most importantly, to make sure the Iranian Army doesn’t get their hands on nuclear weapons!

So much for the moderate man from Rhode Island. Good luck Mr. Chafee.

Ps. Just so folks don’t get in a lather about this being a partisan shot, Jack Reed voted against two of these amendments as well. At least he supported Russ Feingold’s amendment that would have required “as a precondition to United States-India peaceful atomic energy cooperation determinations by the President that United States nuclear cooperation with India does nothing to assist, encourage, or induce India to manufacture or acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.” Chafee voted against this.

Pat | December 11, 2006 7:21 PM link

Pat,

Look more closely at those votes fella, you’ll see democrats and republicans BOTH had the same majority decision on the first. In the 2nd and 3rd, the democrats split pretty heavily. Those are not very convincing selections to make a strong point.

Your anti-Chafee arguments are weak at best.

Don’t forget when he was the DECIDING vote to put down the flag burning amendment when he voted against his party, also look at his important vote on the abortion motion. Chafee did do a great job acting as a moderate Republican Senator. There is no good reason for you to assail his character or political decisions at this point anyways....

Matthew D. Gillette | December 13, 2006 12:23 PM link

Post a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

ADVERTISING



ProJo 7 to 7
Nov « Dec 2006 » Jan
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Archived headlines

Archived
ProJo 9 to 5 News Blog
Oct 2005 - March 2006