« Boil water advisory lifted at Navy housing site |
Today
| Another audit finds 'questionable' nursing home payments »
May 31, 2006
Update: R.I. homeland security funds drop sharply
Judged to be a low risk state, Rhode Island received much less than last year in the new round of federal grants for homeland security announced today.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced the recipients of the $1.7 billion in grants for fiscal year 2006. Rhode Island is getting $7.8 million -- about half of what it received in 2005 and far less than the state requested from the federal government. The grants are being awarded based on the calculated risk and vulnerability of each state and 50 major urban areas.
See the state-by-state breakdown.
Rhode Island ranked 47th of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Compared with other New England states, Rhode Island is getting less than Connecticut ($13.5 million), Massachusetts ($41.2 million), New Hampshire ($7.88 million), and Vermont ($10.9 million). Only Maine, at $7.7 million, is receiving less grant money in New England.
The states receiving the most money are California, at $231.9 million, New York, at $183.6 million, Florida, $100.1 million, and Texas, with $89.8 million.
Rhode Island had requested $60 million for various projects, such as completing detailed plans to handle catastrophes, finishing a project that will allow first-responders throughout the state to communicate during a disaster, and purchasing portal radiological detection equipment to screen transportation.
-- Journal staff writer Amanda Milkovits
Previous grants had been used to buy millions of dollars of emergency equipment, begin a statewide project that'll allow all first-responders to communicate with each other during a disaster, and outfit and train the state's six hazardous-material teams, seven decontamination teams, and an urban search-and-rescue team.
"I am disappointed that state officials will be forced to become more creative with our state's homeland security efforts due to decreased funding levels for this fiscal year," said Rep. James R. Langevin, D-R.I., a member of the Homeland Security Committee. "Despite Rhode Island's cut in funding, I am confident that our Emergency Management Agency will remain dedicated to keeping us all safe in the face of natural disaster or terrorist attack."
Governor Carciieri also expressed his disappointment with the decision. “While I’m pleased that federal officials don’t believe the Ocean State is a target, Rhode Island deserves to receive the federal funding necessary to protect our citizens from terrorist threats and natural disasters,” he said in a statement.
The sharp decrease in funding for 2006 was anticipated by Rhode Island emergency officials after the federal government changed its formula for allocating funding for different homeland security programs. In the past, Homeland Security told state officials how much money their state would receive, and then the officials would submit plans for spending it.
This time, each state received a baseline amount calculated according to population and then had to bid for more money based on risk, need and vulnerability. More money was also shifted to 50 most at-risk cities in the nation -- the Boston area was the only city in New England to make the list.
-- Journal staff writer Amanda Milkovits
Posted by Steve Peoples
at 6:36 PM | Permalink
Blakstone | May 31, 2006 4:05 PM link
Bruce Ryerson | June 1, 2006 7:02 AM link
Greg | June 1, 2006 2:56 PM link
Post a comment
Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.
Couldn't your headline have the GOOD news (Rhode Island was judged to be a low risk state)?
Most people don't care about getting grants. Why do you?