« Communities to get $8 million for open space, recreation |
Today
| High court to mull Carcieri bid for Beacon stay »
May 31, 2006
Is it vandalism, or respect for the dead?
PROVIDENCE -- It has become quite common when people die in car accidents for friends and relatives to post messages of condolence on the web.
But a fatal car crash Sunday night has prompted quite a different outpouring of emotion.
After three young men died when a car driven by a friend crashed into the Ferguson Perforating and Wire Co. on Ernest St., the first posting to the blog came not from a mourner, but from a writer wondering who would pay to repaint the building.
The property is covered with spray-painted messages to the dead.
Of the nearly three dozen messages posted in the first 12 hours that the blog item ran, more than a dozen concerned the graffiti, which some writers called vandalism.
“If the car had crashed into your house, would you be ok with all the spray paint, and would you tell people it’s not the time to discuss it?” Steph posted. “Respect the deceased, but while you are at it, respect the living.”
About two dozen people, some who also were upset about the spray-painted messages, expressed sorrow for the loss of life.
"RIP Marco, Chris and Carlos,” wrote Ashley. “You will forever be missed and please watch over us as we will do the same for your kids. Love Ashley. Sweet dreams, guys.”
Nine people lashed out at those who complained about the spray painting.
“I don’t think that this post was meant for you idiots to comment about the graffiti art on the abandoned building,” wrote someone who just signed “K.”
“People died here," that writer continued. "Someone lost a son, a brother, nephew, father maybe. Really, people! This was meant for people to post condolences and memories of the deceased! Where is the empathy? Where is the respect?”
Alternatively, another area on the projo.com web site where people were asked to share their memories/thoughts/reactions to the accident drew just half a dozen comments. While people shared similar sentiments there as on the blog, there’s much less back-and-forth discussion and debate about the accident and the impromptu memorial.
Posted by Kate Bramson
at 9:24 AM | Permalink
Greg | May 31, 2006 9:32 AM link
Ben | May 31, 2006 9:33 AM link
Bill | May 31, 2006 9:36 AM link
George Hess | May 31, 2006 9:39 AM link
kathy | May 31, 2006 10:08 AM link
Mr. Lee | May 31, 2006 10:37 AM link
Chris | May 31, 2006 10:40 AM link
Keith | May 31, 2006 10:51 AM link
n | May 31, 2006 10:52 AM link
Apparently a Bigot | May 31, 2006 10:55 AM link
J.M. | May 31, 2006 11:04 AM link
Cedric | May 31, 2006 11:21 AM link
Matt | May 31, 2006 11:28 AM link
Jon | May 31, 2006 11:38 AM link
Mary | May 31, 2006 11:39 AM link
Downtown | May 31, 2006 11:41 AM link
JKW | May 31, 2006 11:44 AM link
PO | May 31, 2006 11:47 AM link
LK | May 31, 2006 11:47 AM link
Susan | May 31, 2006 12:14 PM link
Michael | May 31, 2006 2:15 PM link
Ernie | May 31, 2006 3:00 PM link
Me | May 31, 2006 3:49 PM link
Brian | May 31, 2006 6:03 PM link
Leo | June 1, 2006 12:22 PM link
Post a comment
Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.
There's no question that this is vandalism. How is it respecting the dead by disrespecting the living, hard working business owner?
These roadside impromptu memorials have to stop. Not only are they distracting and wretchedly distasteful but they only serve the purpose of making the place where the person died the single most important place in their lives.
If you want to have a memorial, why not in front of the houses of the dead where you can spray paint til your heart's content all over THEIR property?