« Roe v. Wade attorney speaks at Roger Williams | Today | Rally for Brown Bookstore »

April 12, 2006

Games at the Legislature over same-sex marriage

More board games are in store at the Legislature this afternoon for the group pushing for an equal marriage bill, which has stalled at the committee level over the past decade and is now caught up in a liberal-conservative tug of war.

Although the bill that would allow same-sex marriage is not on the House Judiciary Committee’s agenda for discussion or a vote today, Marriage Equality Rhode Island is urging people who care about the issue to spend a second day outside the committee’s meeting room playing board games.

“People are upset and frustrated, and we’re going to draw attention to the fact that they’re playing games with our lives,” said Jennifer Steinfeld, co-chair of Marriage Equality Rhode Island, a volunteer organization.

Marriage Equality has also released poll data, which the group says show that “Rhode Islanders are generally fair-minded and have a live-and-let-live mentality toward their neighbors.”

The group wants to “keep an eye on the process,” Steinfeld said about the game-playing planned for today at the State House.

About 65 people camped out in the State House yesterday, the first day the group began what Steinfeld says will continue until the Legislature’s break.

“We have a number of games that we think have relevant titles – Jumble, Boggle, Sorry,” she said. “And we’re trying to draw attention to the fact that they’re playing games with the political process and that these games affect people’s lives.”

The survey of 500 Rhode Islanders that MERI released this week shows that 46 percent support and 40 percent oppose allowing gay or lesbian couples to marry legally. Forty-four percent of those polled said the issue makes no difference in their decision to support a candidate, according to the survey conducted April 6-9 by polling firm Greenberg Quinlan Rosner.

Posted by Kate Bramson  at 12:50 PM | Permalink

Comments

After 10 years, a yes or no vote on the merits of the bill is not unreasonable.

Randy | April 12, 2006 1:57 PM link

Post a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

ADVERTISING



ProJo 7 to 7
Apr 2006 » May
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Archived headlines

Archived
ProJo 9 to 5 News Blog
Oct 2005 - March 2006