Recent Comments

donjovi on Epstein: Sox disappointed, but proud, to stand pat

rincome on Epstein: Sox disappointed, but proud, to stand pat

ngcfla on Epstein: Sox disappointed, but proud, to stand pat

BOS622 on Epstein: Sox disappointed, but proud, to stand pat

green monster on Epstein: Sox disappointed, but proud, to stand pat

uncasquig on Epstein: Sox disappointed, but proud, to stand pat

brendan on Epstein: Sox disappointed, but proud, to stand pat


To comment on any posting, click on the word 'Comments' at the end of the item.
  ProJo.com
  OLD Projo SoxBlog DO NOT USE

« One hour to go . . .
Main
Varitek to undergo surgery, will miss one month »

July 31, 2006

Epstein: Sox disappointed, but proud, to stand pat

Despite having what he described as ''countless, countless, countless opportunities'' to make a trade prior to today's 4 p.m. trade deadline, Red Sox general manager Theo Epstein said none of the potential deals they could have made would have benefitted the team in the long term. And, thus, the Sox wound up standing pat and not making a trade.

''We came close on a lot of things, but that's the nature of these deals,'' Epstein said at a 5 p.m. press conference at Fenway Park. ''It's pretty easy to come close, pretty hard to find something that works for both teams.''

Epstein said the Sox were ''most aggressive for quality starting pitching, and very little quality starting pitching changed hands.

''It wasn't for lack of effort,'' he said. ''We came very close to a couple of very high caliber starters.''

What held the Sox back was their determination not to trade off their young talent -- such as pitchers Jon Lester, Manny Delcarmen and Craig Hansen off the major-league roster, and prospects such as Pawtucket's Dustin Pedroia and Portland's Edgar Martinez -- and kill the team's long-term plan to build from within.

''We have a long-term plan,'' Epstein said, ''and as much as we desperately wanted to do something to help our big-league team, it would have been shortsighted to sacrifice the long-term plan to incrementally increase our chances this year. We were asked over and over again for a lot of good young players who are part of our long-term plan, and it just wasn't worth it.''

Still, Epstein freely admitted it hurt not to make a trade.

''It's very disappointing,'' he said. ''We had a lot of people in the front office and lots of scouts in the field trying to get something done . . . but, again, in the end you have to do a balancing act. Is it worth sacrificing a high piece of your future for an incremetnal improvement over the next two months?

''I'm proud of the process and proud of the result. We didn't want to do something emotional, reactive and shortsighted, that would lead to us doing something we regret that would be detrimental to the franchise.''

The Yankees were very active, acquiring outfielder Bobby Abreu, pitcher Cory Lidle and first baseman/outfielder Craig Wilson, but Epstein said the Sox weren't tempted to make a deal in response to the Yanks.

''Not for one sceond,'' he said. ''Our approach to the Yankees is to respect them, assume they're going to win 100 games every year, and forget about them until October . . . To scrap that approach, to all of a sudden get emotional or reactive, would be to throw out the window everything we believe in.''

-- ART MARTONE

Posted by Art  at 5:26 PM | Permalink

Comments

What a joke. The Red Sox long term plan is to cut salary over the years while they continue to raise ticket prices. Their pitching is falling apart and they needed to make a move. Once again, the Sox are content with a shot at the wild card, rather than actually winning the division. Epstein should keep touting "the long term plan" and continue to hang his hat on a few good breaks in 2004, because his actions since then have been questionable.

brendan | July 31, 2006 6:00 PM link

I dunno. I believe that there is a long range plan, was ARE finally seeing the fruits of Theo's labors in getting the farm system straightened out and producing some excellent talent. To toss away for a chance at the division, when in the next couple of years (and I haven't written '06 off at all) we might OWN the division, much like the clowns down south have done for the past 8-10 years. Stay the course!

uncasquig | July 31, 2006 6:22 PM link

Hey Brendan,
A few good breaks in 2004? How about Theo having to sit there in 2003 and watch Grady Little light the season on fire in front of his eyes? Did you see what was available for quality starting pitching? There was bleep. As a Sox fan, I thank God Theo's steering this ship. And Bronson Arroyo was one of my favorites. Don't let your fear of the Yankees cloud your perspective.

green monster | July 31, 2006 6:41 PM link

In my opinion, to stand pat like this sends a terrible message to the fans of Red Sox Nation. This was represented perfectly by the attitude of Mark Loretta, whom several teams apparently were attempting to acquire. He explained that the trades weren't entirely necessary, as the Red Sox still held the SECOND best record in the American League. If this is the attitude that the team will take, it will be a very similar October chase for them. First a fluke chase of the Yankees will be made, and I say chase because it won't be long until their #$#@&*% All Star Team catches, and passes this fading Boston club. Then, after the Eastern Division title is in the hands of the deep-pocketed Yankees, the Red Sox will look realistically at their situation, try to make the wildcard, and this year, will be denied by one of two strong central division teams. The Red Sox lac k of deals today shocks me, and I spoke to a Globe Reporter, who said that they just wouldn't budge on a single offer made to teams, which ended up costing them the day. However, I think that the move to acquire the talented Corey from the Rangers will be the most under-rated trade of the year. Corey is a very impressive, shutdown reliever.

BOS622 | July 31, 2006 7:37 PM link

For one I'm glad the sox did nothing in the end. It's right to build from within the orgnization. Was very worried about losing Loretta or Lowell in a trade, this infield that the sox have now should not be toyed with, being by far the best I they have ever had.

ngcfla | August 1, 2006 6:40 AM link

Agree totally with Theo's approach and explanation. The Yankees deal intrigues me. Basically the Yankees got Abeu and Lidle for almost zero quality players but assumed $$$ salary. Is this any different from simply buying players? Doesn't the Commissioner have to approve any trade involving $million? Why was this trade approved. The Commish should have forced the Yankees to give up some quality players regardless of how much salary they were willing to absorb.

rincome | August 1, 2006 2:07 PM link

i totally agree with theo. whats better being dominat for one season then scrap major contributors like pedro, and lowe after the season becouse they became free agent, or like cabbrea becouse we thought we could do better. or keeping our farm system strong and biuld a long term identity for our club.let face it people after next year alot of faces will be gone most namley manny, tek, and schilling. or would you rather give that up to rent clemens for two months.

donjovi | August 3, 2006 12:19 PM link


OLD Projo SoxBlog DO NOT USE

May « Jun 2008
       
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Index of posts


RSS feed

SIDE BLOGS

Krasner

Martone

McAdam

McDonald

McNamara

PawSox

Projo Mannybeingmanny

Projo Sox Crawl

Projo Sox Streakers

Projo SoxTalk with Sean McAdam

Sights and sounds of spring training

Thornton