« What they're saying across country about Belichick and the Pats |
Main
| Friday injury report »
September 14, 2007
Jim Donaldson: Belichick unwilling to admit fault

AP photo / Michael Dwyer
Bill Belichick arrives for today's news conference at Gillette Stadium.
By JIM DONALDSON
Journal Sports Writer
FOXBORO, Mass. - It is what it is.
That's one of Bill Belichick's favorite, fall-back clichés.
He didn't say anything remotely as pertinent or insightful yesterday at his first, post-punishment press conference.
The media wanted to talk about the $500,000 personal fine he'd incurred, the first-round draft choice he'd cost the team in 2008, and the $250,000 the franchise had been fined for, in the words of NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, Belichick's "calculated and deliberate attempt to avoid long-standing rules designed to encourage fair play and promote honest competition on the playing field."
Belichick wanted to talk only about the San Diego Chargers.
He wouldn't even read aloud the written statement he'd issued Thursday night, in which he said: "I accept full responsibility for the actions that led to tonight's ruling. Once again, I apologize to the Kraft family and every person directly or indirectly associated with the New England Patriots for the embarrassment, distraction and penalty my mistake caused. I also apologize to Patriots fans…"
Even in writing, however, Belichick wouldn't acknowledge that he was entirely wrong, adding: "My interpretation of a rule in the Constitution and Bylaws was incorrect."
You be the judge: As recently as Sept. 6, a memo sent to NFL coaches and general managers by Ray Anderson, the league's executive V.P. of football operations, stated "Videotaping of any type, including but not limited to taping of an opponent's offensive or defensive signals, is prohibited on the sidelines, in the coaches' booth, in the locker room, or at any other locations accessible to club staff members during the game."
How is that open to misinterpretation?
And how should we interpret Belichick's unwillingness to say - to actually speak the words, not simply hand out a written statement - ``I was wrong. I'm sorry?"
It is what it is.
What this unseemly, unsportsmanlike incident is, is shameful, egregious (hence the severe penalty issued by the league), costly, and disappointing.
What is particularly disappointing is that Belichick had a chance yesterday to look human, rather than like the cold, calculating automaton he so often appears to be.
How simple it would have been to read yesterday morning the statement he had released Thursday night. How nice it would have been to actually hear him say the words: "I accept full responsibility. I apologize."
Instead, he figured a handout would get him off the hook. It was not unlike his hastily scribbled note saying he had resigned as "HC of the NYJ" at that most awkward, uncomfortable, downright bizarre press conference seven years ago at which it was announced he was turning down Bill Parcells' offer to succeed him as coach of the Jets.
Belichick did that because he wanted to come to New England, where he has had remarkable success, winning three Super Bowls in four years between 2001 and 2004, five division titles in six years - last four in a row, and reaching the conference championship game again last year.
Remember the famous line from the popular book, and movie, Love Story - Love means never having to say you're sorry?
Apparently, winning three Super Bowls also means never having to say you're sorry.
"We're moving on to San Diego," Belichick insisted yesterday, refusing repeatedly to comment on any aspect of the illegal videotaping or the severity of the punishment meted out to him and the team. "That's what we're addressing."
Perhaps he hopes that, if his Patriots look as impressive tomorrow Sunday night in beating the Chargers as they did in routing the Jets last Sunday, that's what fans will focus on, rather than his transgressions.
Perhaps he's hoping that team owner Robert Kraft, who has made a point of taking the high road since saving the franchise in 1994, suddenly will start sounding like Raiders owner Al Davis and simply say: "Just win, baby."
"There's nothing I can do about the past," said Belichick, who clearly wants this tawdry incident to fade away as quickly as possible.
But it's not going to go away. He can ignore, but he can't erase, the stigma of what he did, the stain he has brought to the reputation of the franchise. It still will be a focus of attention at next year's draft, when the Patriots will have to forfeit their first-round pick because of what Belichick did last Sunday.
And there is, in fact, something he could have done about it yesterday: He could have truly apologized. He could have actually said, rather than merely write, the words: ``I'm sorry."
Posted by Mike McDermott
at 1:51 PM | Permalink
Who cares....All atttacks brew from jealousy no matter what the issue may be...just watch as we win the next superbowl
Posted by: John at September 14, 2007 2:05 PM
Coach Bill Belichick is being railroaded by an out of control news media and a bunch of teams so jealous of his winning record that they will do anything--say anything--to bring him down.
Lets face it.
This story of alleged taping is getting old---fast!
And let us not forget that Bob Kraft voted AGAINST hiring the current commissioner.
That says it all!
Posted by: Bob North Smithfield at September 14, 2007 2:41 PM
Jim,
You describe Belichick as a cold, calculating automaton. Does it really matter that he is not good in speaking with the media? You do not develop good social skills while sitting in a room alone, studying film. Isn't it better to have someone that never gets too high or too low to lead your team? Belichick is all about being calculating in the way he runs the Patriots. He is a football mind all about the X's and O's. I find it amusing that the media makes such a big deal about his personality. I don't recall anyone in the New England media complaining about how he has helped to turn this franchise around, winning three Superbowls. I think he is doing the right thing in focusing on the Chargers.
Posted by: Al at September 14, 2007 2:42 PM
Amazing, a rule is a rule. This one in particular is not really open to interpretation. But because it is NE, it should just be swept under the rug? Geez... It's easy to have a winning record when you know what the other team is going to do ahead of time... If it had been the Jets caught cheating, and the Jets won the game, all the NE fans would be screaming bloody murder, and you all know it.
Posted by: m at September 14, 2007 3:00 PM
It is the words "accessible to club staff during the game" that are open to interpretation..... As I understand it, the Genius interpreted the rule to mean that the videotaping could not be done and then used DURING THAT GAME. what that means is that videotaping is fine as long as the video is not broken down and used until the next meeting between the teams.
Posted by: collin at September 14, 2007 3:05 PM
I think the media will be the only reason this even stays in the news - sideline taping has gone on for years, which is why we often see coaches and staff (of many NFL teams) covering up with the clipboard.
The way this article was written it appears that you would just like to blacken the record of the Patriots.
The Patriots will be watched all season under the microscope - let their record going into the playoffs determine if this is as big of a deal as it is being made out to be!
Posted by: katie at September 14, 2007 3:32 PM
I think that the Patriots should suspend Belichick as a way to say that cheating is not tolerated within the organization but the NFL has spoken and IMO, loudly.
I am a New England Fan and right now this sucks!!
This cheating bothers me. I was happy that my team had such a clean image as hard working middle class dogs.
Cheating, no matter how minor is wrong. Anyone who denies this is thinking from a narrow minded view.
Imagine if we (PATRIOTS FANS) found out that The Clots had videotaped last year when they played the Patriots!!!
I know most Patriot fans would be up in arms saying that the Clots cheated and that the Patriots deserved to go to the SuperBowl.
Well, the shoe is on the other foot and we stepped in DOGSH*T!!!
The only good thing from this is that I am using it as a life teaching example to my kids.
It is not the legal or finacial ramifications that really matter,
IT IS THE DISHONOR BROUGHT UPON YOURSELF AND EVERYONE ASSOCIATED WITH YOU!!
I will forgive Belichick but I will not forget this incident. He has tarnished the Patriot's name!
Sincerely,
A sad Patriot
Posted by: Jack at September 14, 2007 3:36 PM
He tried to get away with something. He didn't. End of story. Let's get over it.
Posted by: debbie at September 14, 2007 3:59 PM
Don't limit the transgression to the date he got caught with the tape recorder... how many other games and teams have been cheated of a fair playing field? And the transgressions aren't limited to this event or the act of stealing play calls. At what cost to integrity do the Pats need to go?
This thing stinks and all the rings are tarnished because of it
Posted by: mark at September 14, 2007 4:11 PM
Hey Katie,
I glad we don't have to play the Clots again this year.
If you want to teach a lesson to your kids, teach them how to spell.
Posted by: Jo at September 14, 2007 4:18 PM
I really don't care about videos or signals anymore. Let's watch some football and Jim Donaldson, please get off your high horse. Bill Reynolds is a much better writer anyway.
Posted by: JM at September 14, 2007 4:58 PM
OK everyone, who actually thought Jim Donaldson would have written anything but a negative article in the Journal. I have always said it is easier to go negative than to write an insightful article, and Jim never disappoints me. Now, I am also disappointed by the Patriots, but cannot see any advantage for Belichick to open it up to questions and keep this story going. Can you hear the questions, "How long have you been doing this?...How did you use the tapes to your advantage?... You are right Jim, it is what it is, take the punishment and move on. Let's put the "chargers" to rest and play great football and show the league we are the great team most expected us to be!!
Posted by: Tom at September 14, 2007 5:30 PM
If you of the media weren't into the mass feeding frenzy, Belichick would have been given an apology. The law is the law. Don't tell me what the rule meant; tell me what the rule says.
That's why we are a nation of laws not men. In this case, the NY based commissioner was cowed by the New York based feeding frenzy media. Then it was augmented by a bunch of non-sports writers taking an opportunity to add their clucks; as well as opponents like Polian advocating penalties and seeking advantage.
Taping is apparently a horrendous crime. Yet teams trade tapes prior to every game. Yet crucify a coach for taping for use in a post game analysis, while conforming to the letter of the law.
Is it any wonder than Journalists are now viewed as the lowest pond scum, only superior to ambulance chasing tort lawyers, the lowest scum of an otherwise honorable profession; and politicians who lie in their sleep.
Even used car salesmen outrank you, in public standing. And you frankly, deserve the pond scum rating for this column!
Posted by: AZPatsFan at September 14, 2007 6:00 PM
The silence of the other head coaches in the NFL is deafening... And one can only surmise that's because THEY ALL STEAL SIGNALS. Perhaps they're not dopey enough to commit this sin on video tape , but steal signs they do !!!! How many times have you seen Belichick, Carlie Weis, Tom Coughlin, Mike Holgren, on television covering their mouths as they speak into their head sets or talk on the sidelines ?>??? Who are we kidding, there are spys all over the place come sunday in any stadium in the NFL.
Posted by: Mark K. at September 14, 2007 6:15 PM
Oh, the horror of it all! Trying to steal the opposing team's defensive signals during the game! Boy, that's a first! Good thing that never happens in ML Baseball!
Yes the videotaping broke a rule but isn't it obvious that that tape probably wouldn't be very helpful for that particular game since it would have to have been viewed, digested, interpreted and relayed to the players and coaches during the 15 min halftime break? Now, given that the cameraman was caught during the first quarter it sure wasn't going to help during that game! Look, Coach B. owned up to it, got punished and wants to move on to the next game. I suggest the media, the pompous and rightous fans, and the Pat-haters also move on. Oh, by the way, even if the offense knew every single defensive formation for every single play (which is highly unlikely), the offense still has to execute perfectly every time (also highly unlikely). This is the classic mountain out of a molehill. If, for example, the Raiders had gotten caught instead of the Pats then it would be forgotten by now.
Posted by: Ed Silva at September 14, 2007 6:43 PM
Bill broke the rules, Bill and the Patriots got punished as the commissioner deemed appropriate. Any further commentary is unnecessary and in some cases legally slanderous. If you know Football it is easy to understand there is little to be gained by this activity, but in an environment where "winning is the only thing" even that small edge can tempt. There is cheating everywhere.
Posted by: John at September 14, 2007 7:32 PM
Cheating out in the open where everyone can see you?...what kind of cheating is that? Nothing hidden, nothing sneaky...just one of the MANY, MANY, MANY cameras taping the game, the opposition, the signals. Everyone is overreacting. Was it wrong, yes. Was it against the guidelines? Sure. Was there a penalty? You bet. Was it hidden and sneaky? No...it was right out there in the open. Cheating? I don't think so. Arrogant and Dumb? There you go! The media needs to get a life...the feeding frenzy is more embarrassing than the videotaping. Since Bill isn't a media favorite cuz he only wants to talk football, the media has decided to vilify him. He broke a rule. He got punished. He didn't break the law...he didn't do drugs...he ran a camera out in the open...let it go.
Posted by: Sue Tessier at September 17, 2007 4:32 PM