Recently in Open Government Category

May 22, 2008

On the Agenda: You Won't See It

We've wondered out loud about the Texas Senate's longstanding practice of closed-door "committee of the whole" meetings... now the House General Investigating Committee, looking into the swirling ghost worker scandal, is not going to be seen or heard by the public.

The committee - comprised of R's and D's loyal to House Speaker Tom Craddick - is set to meet today. But the the meeting is likely going into executive session, excluding not just you and me, but even other House members who aren't on the committee. That's not cool, if you ask Democratic leaders of the House who aren't friendly to the speaker.

"Secret meetings blind the public to the workings of their government. We object in the strongest possible terms to sinister "star chamber" proceedings that deny public access," State Representatives Craig Eiland, Jim Dunnam and Pete Gallego Garnet Coleman wrote in a letter to fellow members.

When asked by The Quorum Report, the Chairman of the committee, State Rep Larry Phillips, said this:

"This is not a secret meeting. It happens every day in governmental agencies, from city councils to school boards. It is not uncommon in every governmental agency for these type of issues. In this situation, this is an opportunity to go into executive session. This is appropriate for an investigating committee."

The meeting is set for 10:00am, in Reagan 110, if you want to try and see the part that is public.

April 16, 2008

The Purge, Part 12

If you are a new reader, The Purge is a meandering series on open government -- on state government email retention policies, in particular. I haven't updated The Purge since January, so here's a brief recap:

The Purge started in the early days of this blog, when I read that Missouri Governor Matt Blunt took a bunch of heat for his office's policy of deleting emails every two weeks. Which led me to start a journey on this platform, asking questions about the Texas retention policy. What did we learn? Texas state agencies each get to set their own retention policies, so long as they follow the Texas Public Information Act.

What is the Texas governor's policy? Emails get purged every seven days. But -- employees of the office are asked to save the emails they think are considered public records.

The Purge has more recently become a chronicle of the odyssey of John Washburn.

Wisconsin computer whiz/open records advocate John Washburn read the first Purge entry, and began a quest for all the emails in the office of Governor Rick Perry starting in November, when he programmed a twice-weekly request for emails from four-day periods. But he was priced out -- the emails cost thousands of dollars to process, according to the Governor's office.

Washburn did receive four days worth of emails, which led to a few stories. But he also retained notable First Amendment attorney Joe Larsen, who helped filed a complaint to Travis County DA Ronnie Earle's office. Today, the AP's April Castro learns Earle's office has rejected Washburn's complaint. Excerpted:

Larsen, who argues that the e-mail deletion policy is in violation of Texas public information laws, said he'll take the complaint and request for an injunction to Attorney General Greg Abbott for review.

In a letter to Larsen on Tuesday, Greg Cantrell, Travis County assistant district attorney in the Public Integrity Unit, said the office will not move forward with an injunction against Perry "based on our review of information we received from the Governor's Office."

Larsen complained that the prosecutors appeared to have "accepted everything the governor's office told them" with no independent investigation.

Calls to Cantrell and District Attorney Ronnie Earle were not immediately returned.

"Cantrell agreed that the preservation of this information was important," Larsen said. "But in my conversation with him, the gravity of loss of information does not appear to have been matched by any gravity at the D.A.'s office."

Perry's e-mail policy requires that individual staffers determine which e-mails should be considered public records and print or save them within seven days before they can be deleted. Under the law, only correspondence considered "transitory" -- that with no public interest, such as someone making plans for lunch -- are not considered public records.

"There's no way these people, who have daily responsibilities, also have time to be printing these e-mails and making sure they're being stored properly," Larsen said.

To follow The Purge blow-by-blow, click on the Open Government category in the right rail.

March 14, 2008

Doggett Blasts Secret Session

Congressman Lloyd Doggett is not happy about the House's decision to go into a rare closed session to debate the FISA bill. He called it "mysterious hocus pocus". Here's an excerpt of his remarks:

Recent proceedings in this House served one and only one valuable public purpose--hopefully, this totally unproductive exercise will ensure that the Democratic Leadership will never again yield to demands that the public business of this people's House be conducted in secret.

Linking secrecy and political power is a dangerous recipe. Accountability often ends where secrecy begins.

Yes, there are always those whose self-importance grows by participating in mysterious hocus pocus, who insist that their judgment is superior to ordinary mortals because they possess confidential information not available to mere citizens.

Rarely is that true. It was not true before the costly and troubling invasion of Iraq, and it is not true now.

See the video here

I am a big fan of C-SPAN (and C-SPAN 2 and C-SPAN 3). Arguments for open government aside, the universe is just emptier without the US House on C-SPAN.

March 11, 2008

Re: Craddick Moves to Keep Deposition Private

House Speaker Tom Craddick's spokesperson Alexis DeLee just called with a statement regarding the Speaker and lobbyist Bill Messer's motion to keep their upcoming depositions a.) out of public view; b.) limited to one hour; c.) limited in scope (they want the Plaintiff's attorney to be restricted from asking any questions that have to do with politics.)

"This is a routine filing, and in this case it keeps the depositions focused on the facts of the case, and prevents any kind of political fishing expedition for partisan purposes," DeLee said.

"Fishing" expedition. Was that pun intended?

Craddick Moves to Keep Deposition Private

The week before the 2007 session ended, House Speaker Tom Craddick, R-Midland, and Republican power-lobbyist Bill Messer were sued by a Dallas travel company owner, who claimed the Speaker abused his power in trying to get his money back over a fishing trip that Craddick and Messer couldn't reschedule. See my May 2007 story here.

In a letter signed "Speaker Tom Craddick", Craddick and Messer wrote: "There are clearly exceptional circumstances, and therefore we demand a full refund to be made to each of us in order to avoid legal action or embarrassment to your reputation."

The suit came at a sensitive time for the Speaker, just two days before the attempted coup on the House floor. Critics of the speaker said it was another example of the Speaker's bullying tactics to get things done.

On March 27th, both Craddick and Messer are scheduled for depositions on this suit. But a motion filed by Craddick's Dallas attorneys seeks to keep those depositions out of the realm of politics, and out of public view. In part, it says:

Defendants request that this Court enter a protective order restricting Plaintiff's counsel's inquiries into matters directly related to the allegations made in the lawsuit; that Plaintiff's counsel be instructed to refrain from any political comments, from questioning either of the Defendant's politics, from asking questions relating to anythign other than the fishing trip and the failure to make a refund. Defendants further request that the deposition of each Defendant be limited to one hour, which should be sufficient to discuss fully the limited fact scenario surrounding the fishing trip, its cancelation, and the failure to refund the deposit. Defendants further request that Plaintiff and its counsel be instructed that they cannot distribute the deposition, the deposition videotape, or information contained in the deposition to the media...
Craddick and Messer have also filed a counterclaim to try and get the refund for the trip that didn't happen.

I'll have a full story tonight at ten, we just wrapped up an interview with the plaintiff's attorney, Kevin Buchanan, in Dallas. I've talked to Craddick attorney Roy Minton, but he says he's not involved in this part of the case. A call to Craddick's Dallas attorney (who filed the motion) has yet to be returned.

DOCUMENTS:
Download the motion here.

The original lawsuit (filed May 2007, Craddick's letter to the agent is on page 8.)

Craddick's counterclaim (filed this month)

February 19, 2008

Early Voting Starts... And We're Kicked Out

You know that video you seen in our newscasts of people voting? Mainly just the backs of their heads and shots from a distance? Well, you won't see it from any polling places in Travis County. The county elections coordinator has banned all cameras from polling places (even those in public buildings), per state statute.

The Secretary of State's office says it is state law, but that counties kind of decide on their own what their individual policies will be regarding cameras. Some counties are more lax, which means our early voting video today will come from our sister stations in Dallas and Houston, which WERE allowed to shoot. More on this to come.


Elise Hu is KVUE's Political Reporter and, now, your dedicated blogger.

Email your ideas and feedback to ehu@kvue.com.

Click here to read more about Elise.


May 2008
S M T W T F S
       
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31


Categories




Archives




Recent Posts




Subscribe to feed

Elise Hu's Facebook profile
Add to Technorati Favorites

eXTReMe Tracker

Powered by
Movable Type 4.1






Home | Advertise with Us | About Us | Media Kit | Careers | Site Map | Contact Us
Help | Terms of Service | Privacy | Special Offers
KVUE.com - Texas Associated Press Broadcasters Award winner for Best TV Web Site, 2007
KVUE.com - Edward R. Murrow Award winner for Best TV Web Site, Region 6, 2007
© KVUE Television, Inc.