Digg! AddThis Social Bookmark Button

« Houston Humane Society's comments on today's Pit Bull ruling | Main | Lost Senior Pekingese mix in Northwest Houston »

August 18, 2006

Guest Column:
Legal and ethical implications of the Pit Bull Ruling

I don't claim to be an expert in 'everything animal.' I appreciate and would even love to have more guest columnists who can lend perspective or constructive opinion (please note CONSTRUCTIVE) on current animal issues. If you'd like to share your thoughts in a well-written column, email me at lforonda@khou.com.

Here is Zandra Anderson, who kindly provided the "blow by blow" Pit Bull hearing information posted here, sharing her perspective on yesterday's Pit Bull ruling in Liberty County. Zandra is a trial attorney who also works with animal law, and serves as legal counsel to Spindletop Refuge.

Legal Implications
The dogs over the age of six months were awarded to HHS to destroy by euthanizing them. By contrast, the puppies less than six months old were not awarded to HHS. If there is an auction, they will not be coming from a shelter since HHS was not awarded the dogs.

State law does not require that a humane organization spay or neuter dogs before releasing them for adoption. State law does requires that the releasing agency may not release a dog for adoption unless the dog has been sterilized OR the release is made to a new owner who signs an agreement to have the dog sterilized. It is an "either-or" provision and does not mandate that any humane organization spay or neuter dogs before releasing them for adoption. It gives them an option of doing so or having the new owner sign an agreement to spay or neuter the dog. Sec. 828.002 Health & Safety Code, Dog & Cat Sterilization. In the present case, HHS is not the releasing agency because they were not awarded the puppies. And, even if they were, the above provision applies to dogs that are adopted, not auctioned.

The judge could have ordered that the dogs auctioned be "spayed or neutered at the cost of the receiving party," but he didn't. This provision is a part of the seizure statute for cruelly treated dogs. Sec. 821.023 (f), Health & Safety Code; Disposition of Cruelly Treated Animals.


Implications for the Dogs
The puppies under six months of age were spared by Judge Fitzgerald, or were they? While these puppies will not be killed, auctioning them at a public sale "in the condition they are in" (intact, not spayed or neutered) could put these dogs back in the same predicament they were alleged to have been in in the first place, i.e. to be used as fighting dogs. So, what the judge gave on the one hand, he sort of took away on the other hand.

Selling intact pit bull puppies may only serve to further damage the breed. Consider who will be attracted to buy intact puppies. Dog fighters are attracted to intact puppies for two reasons: to fight them and to breed them.

Let me stress that I do not believe that it was proved in today's hearing that any of these dogs were fighting dogs or had been trained to fight. Further, I do not believe that it was proved today that these dogs were even bred for fighting. There was no evidence of the lineage of the dogs or that any were actually sold for fighting. There was evidence of the existence of a treadmill and pool which the state's witnesses said are used to train fighting dogs. However, one of the state's witnesses admitted that even the Dog Whisperer, Cesar Millan, uses those things to exercise his dogs.

Let me stress another point. These dogs may well have been bred for fighting, trained there for fighting and sold as fighting dogs. I just do not believe those things were proved in today's hearing. Remember, this was not a hearing about dog fighting, but whether or not the dogs were being cruelly treated. It was about the condition of the dogs and the conditions they were living in. This was a civil hearing and not a criminal trial.

Regardless of what the truth may be, it has been alleged in the media for two weeks that these dogs were bred for fighting. As such, I am concerned about who will show up to buy the puppies. And I am concerned for the puppies because they have not been spayed or neutered. Spaying and neutering virtually eliminates the interest of dog fighters in these dogs. They do not use sterilized animals for fighting. Spaying and neutering also virtually eliminates people who want a pit bull as a status symbol. In other words, spaying and neutering is the best way to ensure that these puppies are acquired for pets and not some untoward use.

There is absolutely no good reason that these dogs should not be spayed or neutered. That is their best chance to be good pets, and it prevents backyard breeding of more pit bull puppies many of whom are likely to end up in pounds and shelters only to die. Every pound and shelter in this country has pit bull puppies who have been abandoned, abused and tossed away. The last thing our judicial system needs to do is add to that problem.

Here is another point I want to make clear. I am not advocating the mandatory spaying and neutering of all dogs. There are responsible breeders of all kinds of dogs who breed them for good health, sound confirmation and nice temperament. They breed them for show quality, tracking, search and rescue, as a few examples. There is a place for the specially bred dog which is not inconsistent with the belief that pets should be spayed and neutered.

In the case of these puppies, regardless how good their bloodline may be touted, they should be spayed and neutered. They should be given the best chance at becoming a beloved pet and family member.

I am an adopter of two pit bulls, both as puppies. One was trotting along the freeway as a young pup about 6 months old with no tags. She became a Spindletop orphan and I adopted her. I rescued my male from an abandoned drug house with a K-9 cop. He was about 5 months old. There is no telling what the lineage of either of these two dogs is. There is also good chance they were game bred (bred for fighting).

My dogs were spayed and neutered as puppies which gave them the best shot at being nice pets. Peggy and Zeus are highly intelligent, have a great sense of humor, love people and keep me in stitches with their silly antics. They are my family. I adore them and they are the reason I am staying up late to write this. I would like these seized puppies to have a chance for the same life that my two dogs enjoy--revered family pets who are loved, cared for and responsibly handled so that breed's name is not further tarnished.


Can the order be changed?
Only the owner of the dogs may appeal today's rulings by Judge Fitzgerald. The appeal must be filed within ten days. This Order could be modified on Appeal, and there is nothing to prevent the Order form being modified by the judge even if there is no appeal.

I anticipate an outpouring from the rescue community about this ruling. I have already received some emails about it. Rescuers understand very well what the implications of selling intact pit bulls are and they are voicing their concerns. Public interest does have a way of making a difference.


Zandra Anderson
www.TexasDogLawyer.com

Posted by at 9:22 AM

Your Comments..


ANY comments with profanity will be deleted as soon as I find them, and your IP address will be banned. If you can't make your point without cursing, you don't have any business posting.

Can't someone work with some of these animals with behavior problems instead of just "giving up" and euthenizing them? I am also talking about animals who have less severe behavior probs that may be aggressive over someone taking away their food? I saw an episode on animal planet- an Arizona Shelter where they euthenized a wonderful just becasue he was aggressive at someone taking away his food. SOMEONE COULD WORK WITH THE DOG OVER THIS FOR GOD SAKE!!

   --Posted by: Jill at March 22, 2007 10:14 PM

I completely agree with Zandra and the others that I think that ALL Pitbulls in the shelters, etc. should be neutered or spayed. It should be an automatic and that way there is would be more of a control about the whole issue. And also that all owners of pitbulls should also be obligated to have them neutered or spayed. If not they will be penalized.

   --Posted by: J at August 22, 2006 2:01 PM

I have been in contact with the Houston Humane Society from the start of this case. I have begged them to have their vet, upon whom's advice the judge is acting, mention that altering these pups is consistent with there being good pets and more importantly, less attractive to fighters and idiots of all sorts. I have also begged them to let me evaluated the young dogs for our LawDogs program, where they could become much needed narcotics detection dogs... I have met a stone wall all along the way.
Bottom line: the HSUS needs to step up and buy these dogs and give them to the eagerly awaiting breed rescue folks who will evaluate them, alter them and place them responsibly (I dread any going to "no-kill" facilities and "sanctuaries" where they will spend their lives in crates and small kennels). The HSUS takes a hard stand against dog fighting - and rightly so - but letting these pups be put right back into the hands of dog fighters (or simply irresponsible owners) is so unfair to the pups. Buying those pups will cost less than one rescue flight of dogs from Hurricane Katrina. Please contact the HSUS and encourage them to do the right thing.

   --Posted by: Diane Jessup at August 22, 2006 11:33 AM

The judge is from Liberty County, Well that explains it all. Judge Fitzgerald obviously does not / nor cares to understand the implications for these "puppies".

Rulings like these perpetuate these scenarios and serve to make Humane organizations and animal advocates even more determined to "Speak for those who can not speak for themselves"

   --Posted by: Liz at August 21, 2006 11:20 AM

These puppies should be required to be spayed or neutered to prevent breeding for fighting purposes and also to prevent the increasing numbers of unwanted or neglected pets.Pits bulls have a reputation for being bad dogs when they are NOT!, they are the product of how people treat them. When they get in the hands of people with cruel intentions or uneducated about how to take care of them, they end up suffering, and they do NOT deserve that. I have two pit bulls I rescued from cruelty who are the most wonderful pets in the world to me. We should all take care of those who cannot speak or defend themselves!

   --Posted by: Christina at August 18, 2006 11:16 AM

Zandra, I agree with you, "There is absolutely no good reason that these dogs should not be spayed or neutered." And I'd like to think it's not the case, but the ONLY reason I can think of as to why this Judge did not rule that they be spayed/neutered is that he knows if they are they will not get the money for them at auction that they would if they're not spayed/neutered.

I'd like to think this is not the case of a Judge more interested in filling the County coffers then he is in the welfare of these dogs. But it sure looks that way to me!! And I am hoping that the outcry from the rescue community, which has already begun, will make him modify his Order.

   --Posted by: Claudia at August 18, 2006 10:43 AM

There are many things that I do not agree with how things have been handled.
But 3 that really stick out in my mind:
1. That the animals will be AUCTIONED off to anyone willing to pay money
2. That these animals will not be spayed or neutered!!
What if someone that spent enough money during the auction is the same type of person that had these animals before?!? Just breed more and more and they can be in the same situation. I feel as though this is a no win situation.
I am not saying everyone will do that, but there are so many animals out there already that need to be adopted.
We need to fix all of the adoptable dogs and there should be a strict adoption process for these poor dogs that have been exposed to such an unfortunate situation.
3. I don't agree with the euthanization of ALL dogs over the age of 6 months. I feel as though they should have their temperment tested and it should be a case by case basis.

   --Posted by: Sheila at August 18, 2006 10:36 AM
Animal Attraction Blog:
Mar 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

frontpage hit counter