Animal ATTRACTION |
|
August 2009
Categories
More KHOU Blogs
|
From the ASPCA: Federal: Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act passes in the House! More information here.
Bill No.: H.R. 4239 Update, November 13, 2006: We are sorry to report that the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act has passed in the House of Representatives. The bill will now be presented to the President for his signature prior to being passed into law. Thank you to all who have supported our efforts to defeat this bill. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- H.R. 4239, the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA), is a bill that could make it a crime punishable by imprisonment to cause any business classified as an "animal enterprise" to suffer a loss of profit -- even if the company's financial decline is the result of legal activities, such as peaceful protests, consumer boycotts or media campaigns. The term "animal enterprise" would include manufacturers, distributors and sellers of animals or animal products, research facilities, pet stores, breeders, zoos, rodeos, circuses, and animal shelters and the like. While the ASPCA strongly opposes acts of violence, including vandalism, property damage and trespass, this bill threatens to criminalize as "terrorism" otherwise lawful, constitutionally protected acts often utilized by citizens and organizations to effect change. Lawful and peaceful protests that, for example, urge a consumer boycott of a company that does not use humane procedures, could be the target of this provision if the activity resulted in economic damage to the company. The bill would also make it illegal to expose cruel conditions at facilities such as puppy mills and research labs, if exposure of such conditions -- even if done lawfully -- would result in economic damage to the animal enterprise. There is no exemption in the bill to exclude "economic damage" that results from the disclosure of information about a company’s treatment of animals, which is disclosed through public information. 3 CommentsLeave a comment |
How sad!!!
What kind of cold hearted person could sign
a bill like that into law? Don't people
realize that the very laws they so dislike are a
direct result of abuse.
So now we can work to get this one reversed and
then create some more to take it place.
Unbelievable!
It seems like this would set a dangerous precedent. You would be allowed to protest peacefully by Constitutional law, but the financial result of your protest could land you with criminal charges.
Does this mean Oprah's comment regarding beef, made with this law in effect, would make her guilty of a crime?