« April 2006 | Main | June 2006 »

May 26, 2006

More Non-Stops from PDX to Mexico

Alaska Airlines Logo.png

Today Alaska Airlines announced it's applied for new, non-stop flights from Portland to both Los Cabos and Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. These will be Alaska's first international flights to and from PDX.

Flights from PDX to Los Cabos will operate four times a week, beginning in the fall, while flights from PDX to Puerto Vallarta will operate three times a week. Both are new routes from Portland.

PDX has been growing its international service significantly over the last three years. In that time, new non-stops have been added to Mexico, Japan, and Germany. PDX international traffic is up about 10%, year-over-year. Mexicana Airlines has seen the biggest increase... it's traffic is up 31% this year.

PDX International Destinations
Current and Planned, as of 5/26/2006

Canada:
Vancouver, via Air Canada (5/day) and Horizon Air (4/day).

Mexico:
Guadalajara, via Mexicana (daily).
Los Cabos, via Alaska Airlines (4/week).
Mexico City, via Mexicana (daily, 1-stop).
Puerto Vallarta, via Alaska Airlines (3/week).

Asia:
Singapore, via Northwest Airlines (daily, 1-stop).
Tokya - Narita, via Northwest Airlines (daily).

Europe:
Frankfurt, via Lufthansa German Airlines (daily).

Alaska's Press Release on New Non-Stops to Mexico:

Alaska Airlines Files For Additional Nonstop Flights Between Pacific Northwest And Mexico
5/26/2006 10:37am

SEATTLE -- Alaska Airlines has applied to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) for authority to fly nonstop between Seattle and Cancun, Mexico, and between Portland, Ore., and the Mexican resort destinations of Los Cabos and Puerto Vallarta. If approved, the new seasonal flights will operate, beginning this year, from the end of October to the end of April.

The airline plans to offer nonstop service four days a week between Seattle and Cancun, and Portland and Los Cabos, and three days a week between Portland and Puerto Vallarta.

"Because of the popularity of these markets with travelers looking for a winter break, we're hoping to expand our nonstop service between the Pacific Northwest and Mexico," said John MacLeod, Alaska's managing director of planning and alliances. "This is part of our ongoing investment in our growing route system in Mexico and will give our customers more options to fly our award-winning service."

A DOT decision on the new routes is expected in June.

Alaska Airlines introduced service to Mexico in 1988. During its winter schedule, the airline operates 38 flights daily serving nine Mexican destinations, including Cancun, Guadalajara, Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo, Loreto, Los Cabos, Manzanillo/Costa Alegre, Mazatlan, Mexico City and Puerto Vallarta.

Alaska Airlines and sister carrier, Horizon Air, together serve 88 cities through an expansive network throughout Alaska, the Lower 48, Canada and Mexico.

May 19, 2006

A Brief History: The Cessna 210

After the crash of a Cessna 210 on Thursday in Battle Ground, I did a little research on the type. The Cessna 210 is widely considered one of the best single-engine aircraft ever built. Pilots says it's stable in flight... provides good performance... and is easy to handle. Between 1960 and 1986, Cessna built 9240 210's... a huge number of planes, many of which are still flying all over the world. When you take into considerartion the size of the Cessna 210 fleet, there have been relatively few incidents and accidents involving the plane.

Cessna 210.jpg
Cessna 210, Courtesy NOAA

We found 13 Cessna 210 accident reports, from the National Transportation Safety Bureau, in the last 5 months (since the beginning of the year). In only one of the accidents was someone killed.

One of those reports sounds very similar to the accident Thursday in Battle Ground: a pilot who couldn't stop the plane before it left the end of the runway, and smashed into a fence.

I've attached all 13 preliminary reports below, in reverse chronological order. The last one on the list is the only incident in which an aircraft overran a runway.

Cessna 210 Accident Reports, January 1 - May 15, 2006

Friday, April 21, 2006
Henryville, Indiana
1 Uninjured

The airplane collided with trees and the terrain following a loss of engine power during an instrument landing system approach. The pilot reported he switched fuel tanks from the right tank to the left tank during the approach. He then noticed a decrease in airspeed and no fuel flow indication on the fuel flow gauge. He then switched back to the right fuel tank. He stated he broke out of the clouds at 400 feet. He stated he made a turn to line up with a field and the airplane contacted tree tops. The pilot reported the airplane contacted the ground as he continued to line up with the field. Post accident inspection of the airplane revealed the left fuel tank was empty and the right fuel tank contained approximately 19 gallons of fuel.

Wednesday, April 19, 2006
Arkansas, Kansas
2 Serious Injuries

On April 19, 2006, approximately 2035 central daylight time, a Cessna T210N, N7617N, was destroyed when during low altitude cruise flight, the airplane struck power lines, and then impacted terrain near Arkansas, Kansas. A post-impact fire ensued. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The personal flight was being conducted under the provisions of title 14 CFR Part 91 without a flight plan. The private pilot and passenger on board the airplane sustained serious injuries.

Local law enforcement at the accident scene reported that the pilot may have been flying low taking pictures when the airplane struck the power lines. A power line was observed being down at the site. The deputy said that a post-crash fire consumed most of the airplane. He also said that the power was out in the area.

Wednesday, April 19, 2006
Ludville, Georgia
1 Fatal

A Cessna 210A, N6579X, owned and piloted by a commercial pilot, descended into remote mountainous terrain near Ludville, Georgia, after entering an area of thunderstorms. The pilot, the sole occupant, was fatally injured. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The personal flight was operating under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 while on an instrument flight rules flight plan. The accident flight departed Prattville - Grouby Field Airport (1A9), Prattville, Alabama, at 1005, and was en route to Manassas Regional/Harry P. Davis Field Airport (HEF), Manassas, Virginia.

At 1018, the pilot checked-on with Atlanta Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) and was subsequently handled by four sectors. The accident airplane was cleared to 11,000 feet mean sea level (msl). The pilot was not issued weather advisories or related SIGMETS, according to Atlanta ARTCC voice communications. At 1109:28, the pilot asked to deviate to the south due to weather. Atlanta ARTCC approved the turn to the south, but radar contact was lost at 1110:02 at 5,500 feet msl. A plot of the aircraft radar track data indicated that the airplane entered a level 6 thunderstorm prior to the loss of radar contact.

The airplane impacted about 3.3 nautical miles northwest of Ludville, Georgia, in rugged wooded terrain. The associated debris was located in two general areas, situated about 1 nautical mile apart from each other. The wreckage distribution was consistent with a low altitude in-flight breakup.

The main wreckage was situated in a four foot deep crater. There was limited damage to the overhead tree canopy, consistent with a near vertical descent path. The main wreckage consisted of the cockpit, engine, propeller, left and right main wing spars, nose and main landing gear, left and right flap, and portions of the empennage. The second area of wreckage consisted of portions of the left and right wing leading edges, the upper portion of the vertical stabilizer leading edge and tip rib, a small section of aileron and the left cabin door. The two ailerons and the outboard portion of the right elevator were not recovered during the on-scene investigation. Two of the three propeller blades were recovered, both of which exhibit chordwise scratches and blade twist. All four corners of the airplane were identified; cockpit/engine, left wing, empennage, right wing, and fuselage. The major airframe components, engine, and recovered propeller blades were transported to a local Department of Transportation accident reconstruction yard.

A two-dimensional wreckage layout confirmed flight control cable circuit continuity for ailerons, elevators, and rudder. The flaps and landing gear were fully retracted. Functional testing and disassembly of the wet vacuum pump showed no evidence of pre-impact failure. No gyros instruments were found intact. No liberated gyros were found at the accident site. The on-scene investigation did not reveal any pre-impact anomalies that would have prevented the normal operation of the airplane or its related systems.

Friday, April 14, 2006
Lubbock, Texas
1 Minor Injury

A Cessna 210F single-engine airplane, N1966S, was destroyed by fire following an inflight fire and subsequent emergency landing near Lubbock, Texas. The private pilot, the sole occupant, sustained minor injuries. The airplane was registered to and operated by the pilot. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a flight plan was not filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The local flight originated from the Town and Country Airpark (F82), near Lubbock, Texas, about 1450.

According to the pilot, approximately five to seven minutes after takeoff, he heard a "poof" come from behind the instrument panel, smelled an odor consistent with an electrical fire, and observed dark gray smoke and flames around his feet. The pilot responded by turning off the electrical master switch to which no change was noted. The pilot then elected to perform an emergency landing to a soft cotton field. Shortly after touchdown the airplane nosed over and came to rest in an inverted position. The pilot was able to egress the airplane unassisted. The airplane was engulfed in flames a few minutes later.

Sunday, April 02, 2006
Wells, Nevada
2 Minor Injuries

The airplane veered off the runway and nosed over. Prior to departure the pilot obtained a full weather briefing, but there was no information regarding the surface winds at his destination airport. The pilot stated that the approach to runway 26 was normal, despite the crosswind conditions that he encountered. Just prior to touchdown a strong gust blew the airplane to the left side of the runway. He attempted to execute a go-around by adding full power, but the airplane was unable to get airborne due to the strong wind conditions. The airplane touched down off the runway surface and nosed over, coming to rest inverted. The airplane incurred damage to the wings and tail section.

Thursday, March 09, 2006
Jesup, Georgia
1 Minor Injury

A Cessna 210, N6540X, registered to CVL Enterprise LLC and operated by a private owner, as a 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight, collided with trees during a forced landing near Jesup, Georgia. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and instrument flight rules flight plan was filed. The airplane sustained substantial damage, and the airline transport rated pilot reported minor injuries. The flight originated from Malcolm McKinnon Airport, on December 1, 2006 at 1536.

The pilot stated he departed the Malcolm Mc Kinnon Airport (SSI), on an instrument cross-country flight to Peachtree DeKalb Airport (PDK). The pilot stated after climb out he leveled off at 6,000 feet, and noticed that the EDM #2 cylinder light began to flicker, and shortly after the low voltage light illuminated. The pilot contacted air traffic control personnel, and requested to return to SSI. After the request was made with ATC personnel to return to SSI, the engine began to make a loud "banging" noise, and then it seized. The pilot informed ATC of the emergency, and requested to divert to the nearest airport. ATC diverted the pilot to the Jesup-Wayne County Airport (JES), where he would attempt an emergency landing. The pilot stated that he was unable to maintain altitude, and crashed into a stand of trees two miles south east of JES.

Sunday, February 12, 2006
Long Beach, California
1 Serious Injury

A Cessna 210M, N6895B, collided with shipping containers during a forced landing on Pier J Berth 266 at the Port of Long Beach, Long Beach, California. The pilot/owner operated the airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91. The airplane was destroyed. The private pilot, the sole occupant, was seriously injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local area flight that departed Compton/Woodley Airport (CPM), Compton, California, at an unknown time. A flight plan had not been filed.

According to witnesses, the airplane was traveling in a westbound direction near the water's edge. The airplane made a turn back towards the east, and then made a slight left turn northbound. While in the turn, the airplane flew between two shipping containers, and then struck the ground in a nose low attitude and came to rest against a shipping container. The witnesses reported that they did not notice any sound coming from the engine, nor did they notice the propeller or whether it was turning or not.

A witness stated that the pilot remained secured in his seat but was lying partially out of the airplane. Witnesses released the seat belt and removed the pilot from the airplane. They observed fuel leaking out of the forward part of the cockpit area, as well as the wings, and put sawdust down on the fuel to soak it up. They were not able to quantify the amount of fuel, but did report, "There was a lot of fuel coming out of the airplane." A witness also reported that the pilot indicated that there was a fuel problem, but did not elaborate as to what the fuel problem was.

The National Transportation Safety Board investigator-in-charge (IIC) responded to and examined the airplane at the accident site. It came to rest on a magnetic heading of 030 degrees in a nose down attitude against a shipping container. The tail, the left landing gear, and a seat bottom separated from the airplane and were found about 30 feet south of the main wreckage. The wings remained connected to the fuselage. The left wing tip fairing separated from the wing, but was lying near the wing edge in its normal location. The navigation lights remained attached and intact on the wing tip. The right wing was bent about midspan, with the wing tip and navigations lights remaining attached and intact. The engine remained attached to the engine mounts and firewall, with the firewall partially separated from the cockpit area. There was no visible external damage to the engine. The 3-bladed propeller remained attached to the propeller assembly, which remained connected to the engine. One blade had chordwise scratching at the tip. The other two blades were not visibly damaged.

The two shipping containers that the airplane flew through were oriented along an east-west orientation. The container on the east side was gray with COSCO written on it. The other container was on the west side and red with no large lettering on it. Both containers, towards the edges, contained smaller identifying markings. A 10-foot space separated the two containers. The Safety Board IIC examined both shipping containers for impact damage. The gray container showed no evidence of impact damage. The red shipping container, on the southerly facing side, showed evidence of impact damage. A black transfer mark was on the shipping container about midspan of the container, and 4 feet down from the top of the container. The mark went up and towards the outer east side edge of the shipping container and measured 76 inches at a 10-degree angle in an upward direction. The top corner portion, about 2 feet inboard from the edge of the container, had a semicircular impression in it, and the adjacent top corner of the shipping container had a white paint transfer.

The left horizontal stabilizer's leading edge had a black rubber boot. A red paint transfer mark was on the black rubber section. The airplane's fuselage was torn open from the pilot's side door to the empennage. A red paint transfer mark similar in color to the red shipping container was along the length of the fuselage.

During the recovery, fuel was leaking out of multiple areas of both the left and right wings.

Saturday, February 11, 2006
Sarasota, Florida
1 Uninjured

A Cessna P210N, N6504P, registered to and operated by a private individual, experienced collapse of the nose landing gear during the landing roll at the Sarasota/Bradenton International Airport, Sarasota, Florida. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed for the 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight from Okeechobee County Airport, Okeechobee, Florida, to Sarasota/Bradenton International Airport. The airplane was substantially damaged and the commercial-rated pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. The flight originated about 1330, from Okeechobee County Airport.

The pilot stated that after takeoff the flight proceeded to the destination airport where he was cleared to land on runway 14. He reported he lowered the landing gear and confirmed he had a green landing gear extended light and he visually saw that the nose and left main landing gears were down. He turned onto final approach and reported the landing was "...firm but not a hard landing." As the nose lowered he heard the propeller contact the runway and the airplane slid to a stop.

Wednesday, February 01, 2006
Rome, Georgia
2 Uninjured

A Cessna T210N, N2134U, registered to Dean Steel Buildings, Inc., and operated by a private individual as a 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight, experienced total loss of engine power, and made a forced landing in the vicinity of Rome, Georgia. The airplane received substantial damage. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The airline transport-rated pilot and private-rated passenger reported no injuries. The flight originated from the Richard B. Russell Airport, Rome Georgia, on February 1, 2006, at 1615.

Sunday, January 29, 2006
Murfreesboro, Tennessee
1 Serious Injury

A Cessna T210M, N761ZV, registered to and operated by an individual; as a 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight, local flight, collided with the ground during an emergency landing at Murfreesboro Municipal Airport, Murfreesboro, Tennessee. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident, and a flight plan was not filed. The airplane was destroyed by post impact fire, and the private-rated pilot received serious injuries. The flight originated from the Smyrna Airport, Smyrna, Tennessee, the same day, about 1420.

According to the Smyrna Airport control tower personnel, after departure the pilot reported that he needed to "come back and land" because of an electrical trim problem. Tower personnel advised the pilot that he was 5 miles south of the Murfreesboro Municipal Airport, which was the closest airport to his position. The pilot replied that he would continue and land at the Murfreesboro Airport. Witnesses on the ground reported seeing the airplane flying "erratic," and "porpoising." The airplane collided with the ground short of runway 18. The emergency personnel who arrived on scene reported that the pilot stated, "that the electric trim was not working, and he was fighting the yoke all the way down."

Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Mariposa, California
1 Minor Injury, 1 Uninjured

A Cessna T210N, N4791C, experienced a total loss of engine power during cruise flight near Mariposa, California. During the subsequent forced landing on rough terrain, the airplane collided with objects and was substantially damaged. Representations, LLC., Santa Ynez, California, operated the airplane. The private pilot sustained minor injures, and the passenger was not injured. The flight was performed under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91, and an instrument flight rules flight plan had been filed. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed during the business flight that originated from Visalia, California, about 0900.

The pilot reported to the National Transportation Safety Board investigator that he intended to fly to Sacramento, California. However, because of inclement weather he planned to divert to an alternate location. While en route about 6,000 feet mean sea level, one cylinder in the engine indicated a loss of exhaust gas and cylinder head temperature. Thereafter, an increasingly strong vibration was felt, oil dispersed onto the front windscreen, and all engine power was lost. During the landing flare, the airplane impacted an oak tree, a fence, and a rock outcrop.

Wednesday, January 04, 2006
Midland, Texas
2 Uninjured

While in cruise flight at an altitude of 6,500 feet, the 1,150-hour commercial pilot noticed a rise in engine oil temperature. The pilot opened the cowl flaps and increased the mixture control, which reduced the EGT and the CHT. Approximately 5 minutes later, the engine started "running rough and sparks appeared from the cowling with loud bangs." The pilot shut-down the engine and extended the landing gear for a forced landing on a road. The airplane was unable to make the road and during the night forced landing in a mesquite covered field, the airplane sustained structural damage. An examination of the engine revealed that several of the engine's connecting rods had failed and the number one piston was found to be eroded.

Monday, January 02, 2006
Auburn, Alabama
2 Minor Injuries, 1 Uninjured

According to the pilot, while making a localizer approach to runway 36, in IFR conditions, the airplane broke out of the overcast at about 400 feet above ground level. The pilot forced the airplane down and landed about 2,000 feet past the runway's threshold at about 100 to 120 knots indicated airspeed. The pilot stated that he was unable to stop the airplane before it departed the end of the runway and collided with the airport's perimeter fencing. There were no mechanical problems reported by the pilot or discovered during the post-accident examination of the airplane.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause of this accident as follows: The pilot's failure to attain the proper touchdown point during landing which resulted in an overrun and subsequent on ground collision with a fence.

Cheaper to Fly or Drive?

Tonight on NewsChannel 8 we report the results of our survey, indicating just how similar the cost is to fly versus drive, with gas prices at an all-time high. Airlines are raising airfares to compensate for increasing fuel costs, but airfares have not gone up as quickly as has the prices at the pump. That means the airlines still have some deals for summer travel, when you consider how much it would cost you to drive on the same trip.

In most cases, if you're traveling alone, it's cheaper to fly, even if you don't take into account how much time you're saving. In many cases, it's a wash for a couple to fly instead of drive. That's where the time calculations really come into play. For a family of four, it's still considerably more expensive to fly. Our survey shows, most of the time, a family of four will pay about double the fuel cost to buy airline tickets. But again, time considerations, and wear-and-tear on a car come into play at some point. Those are hard variables to quantify. They mean something different to each of us. So we left those considerations out of our calculations.

We completed our survey at noon on May 10th. We calculated the cost of three trips, all departing on July 12th and returning on July 19th.

We calculated the fuel cost for two different vehicles. The first: a 2004 Toyota Camry. The second: a 2004 Ford Explorer. We chose those vehicles because they were the best-selling cars in their respective categories (sedan and SUV) for the 2004 calendar year.

We used the AAA Fuel Cost Calculator website to do the math for us. It uses regional gas prices, to come up with an accurate representation of what each trip will truly cost. The day we did our calculations, these were the regional averages:

Pacific Coast: $3.26
Mountain West: $2.83
Southwest: $2.85
Midwest: $2.72
Great Lakes: $2.82
Southeast: $2.81
Mid-Atlantic: $2.92
New England: $2.94

In addition to the cost of gas, we allowed for hotel nights in each direction on trips longer than 12 hours. We calculated the cost for all trips with and without a hotel stay. For hotel stays, we chose a city equidistant from the departure and arrival cities. We used hotels.com to find the lowest possible rate. All hotels chosen were rated as 2-stars.

For trips by air, we searched for the lowest available airfare for the given dates, to any acceptable airport in the destination city. Airfare searches were also completed on May 10th.

We, then, calculated the cost of all trips for a single traveler, a couple, and a family of four.

All calculations are roundtrip.

Fly or Drive Survey Results

Portland to Los Angeles
Ground Mileage: 1910
Air Mileage: 1668

Single, 2004 Camry
Gas: $205.32
Hotel: $126.66 (two nights in Sacramento)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 30:16
Total Transportation Cost: $331.98

Single, 2004 Explorer
Gas: $313.38
Hotel: $126.66 (two nights in Sacramento)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 30:16
Total Transportation Cost: $440.04

Couple, 2004 Camry
Gas: $205.32
Hotel: $140.60 (two nights in Sacramento)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 30:16
Total Transportation Cost: $345.92

Couple, 2004 Explorer
Gas: $313.38
Hotel: $140.60 (two nights in Sacramento)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 30:16
Total Transportation Cost: $453.98

Family of Four, 2004 Camry
Gas: $205.32
Hotel: $140.60 (two nights in Sacramento)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 30:16
Total Transportation Cost: $345.92

Family of Four, 2004 Explorer
Gas: $313.38
Hotel: $140.60 (two nights in Sacramento)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 30:16
Total Transportation Cost: $453.98

Single, Flight from PDX to Los Angeles Int'l
Airfare: $317 (Alaska Airlines, non-stop)
Elapsed Time (Flight Time Plus 4 Total Hours for Check-In/Bag Claim): 8:30
Total Transportation Cost: $317

Couple, Flight from PDX to Los Angeles Int'l
Airfare: $317 (Alaska Airlines, non-stop)
Elapsed Time (Flight Time Plus 4 Total Hours for Check-In/Bag Claim):
Total Transportation Cost: $634

Family of Four, Flight from PDX to Los Angeles Int'l
Airfare: $317 (Alaska Airlines, non-stop)
Elapsed Time (Flight Time Plus 4 Total Hours for Check-In/Bag Claim):
Total Transportation Cost: $1268

Portland to Denver
Ground Mileage: 2482
Air Mileage: 1982

Single, 2004 Camry
Gas: $248.98
Hotel: $113.70 (two nights in Ogden, UT)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 36:08
Total Transportation Cost: $362.68

Single, 2004 Explorer
Gas: $376.38
Hotel: $113.70 (two nights in Ogden, UT)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 36:08
Total Transportation Cost: $490.08

Couple, 2004 Camry
Gas: $248.98
Hotel: $127.34 (two nights in Ogden, UT)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 36:08
Total Transportation Cost: $376.32

Couple, 2004 Explorer
Gas: $376.38
Hotel: $127.34 (two nights in Ogden, UT)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 36:08
Total Transportation Cost: $503.72

Family of Four, 2004 Camry
Gas: $248.98
Hotel: $127.34 (two nights in Ogden, UT)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 36:08
Total Transportation Cost: $376.32

Family of Four, 2004 Explorer
Gas: $376.38
Hotel: $127.34 (two nights in Ogden, UT)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 36:08
Total Transportation Cost: $503.72

Single, Flight from PDX to Denver Int'l
Airfare: $321
Elapsed Time )Flight Time Plus 4 Total Hours for Check-In/Bag Claim): 8:48
Total Transportation Cost: $321

Couple, Flight from PDX to Denver Int'l
Airfare: $321
Elapsed Time (Flight Time Plus 4 Total Hours for Check-In/Bag Claim): 8:48
Total Transportation Cost: $642

Family of Four, Flight from PDX to Denver Int'l
Airfare: $321
Elapsed Time (Flight Time Plus 4 Total Hours for Check-In/Bag Claim): 8:48
Total Transportation Cost: $1284

Portland to Chicago
Ground Mileage: 4198
Air Mileage: 3502

Single, 2004 Camry
Gas: $429.58
Hotel: $126.52 (two nights in Cheyenne)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 61:46
Total Transportation Cost: $556.10

Single, 2004 Explorer
Gas: $655.58
Hotel: $126.52 (two nights in Cheyenne)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 61:46
Total Transportation Cost: $782.10

Couple, 2004 Camry
Gas: $429.58
Hotel: $126.52 (two nights in Cheyenne)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 61:46
Total Transportation Cost: $556.10

Couple, 2004 Explorer
Gas: $655.58
Hotel: $126.52 (two nights in Cheyenne)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 61:46
Total Transportation Cost: $782.10

Family of Four, 2004 Camry
Gas: $429.58
Hotel: $126.52 (two nights in Cheyenne)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 61:46
Total Transportation Cost: $556.10

Family of Four, 2004 Explorer
Gas: $655.58
Hotel: $126.52 (two nights in Cheyenne)
Elapsed Time (Driving Time): 61:46
Total Transportation Cost: $782.10

Single, Flight from PDX to Chicago Midway
Airfare: $337
Elapsed Time (Flight Time Plus 4 Total Hours for Check-In/Bag Claim): 11:28
Total Transportation Cost: $337

Couple, Flight from PDX to Chicago Midway
Airfare: $337
Elapsed Time (Flight Time Plus 4 Total Hours for Check-In/Bag Claim): 11:28
Total Transportation Cost: $674

Family of Four, Flight from PDX to Chicago Midway
Airfare: $337
Elapsed Time (Flight Time Plus 4 Total Hours for Check-In/Bag Claim): 11:28
Total Transportation Cost: $1348

Comments? E-mail me at jpenning@kgw.com.

May 11, 2006

Follow-Up: Your Comments on Military Video on United Flights

On May 8th, NewsChannel 8 reported on the inflight entertainment you see on United Airlines flights from Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, and San Francisco to PDX. United says it's added a 13-minute segment called "Today's Military." It looks a lot like a news program, profiling ten members of the US Military, all over the world... including Oregon National Guardsman Andrew Canfield. Some say its "passed-off" as a news program, even though its origins are quite different than the orgins of a news segment.

"Today's Military" was shot, produced, written, and edited by the Department of Defense. Agents there admit it's a recruiting video, meant to encourage young men and women to enlist. Yet, at no point in the inflight program, is that fact ever noted. There are no graphics on the screen, no credits, no voiceover to tell viewers what they're really watching. The Department of Defense isn't mentioned once. Not once, is any branch of the military tied to the video's production. Some passengers say it's intentionally meant to deceive. Others appreciate that the video is telling "good news" stories about our armed forces.

The Department of Defense paid United $36,000 for the video to run on westbound flights, from April 17th to May 17th. Part of the agreement specified the DoD wouldn't be indentified. In the agreement, United says the video will reach about 3-million travelers.

Media ethics experts say, at best, it's deceiving not to identity the video's producer. Ethics experts say its important that people know they're being advertised to, and in this case, they do not. Moreover, they say, airline passengers are a captive audience, who can't just change the channel.

United says it often sells video spots. It says it averages between 7 and 15 minutes of paid video programming per 2-hour segment.

After the story ran, viewers filled my e-mail inbox with their opinions... on both sides of the debate. Here's a collection of some of the comments I read:

"I totally support United Airlines, and the DoD in running the 'commercial' on flights, if it had been a private business, it would have been hailed as a brilliant new way of advertising."

"I think it's very deceptive. I don't think they should have them. Or if they do, they should say this is from the military... or this is an Army recruiting thing... or whatever their slant is."

"You are too young to remember something called RKO Pathe News that was run in theatres during W.W.2. Some of it may have been propaganda, but such features helped to generate a degree of unity and a sense of purpose for a nation that was engaged in a struggle that threatened the existence of free nations."

"What our government's up to... trying to do all this stuff covertly... it does not make me happy."

"Of course, as you so pompously proclaim, you don't broadcast the American Forces' side of this conflict. But you have no trouble broadcasting anything Al Jazeera puts out."

That last e-mail refers to the following paragraph from my original blog on this topic:

"KGW has received a number of similar 'video new releases' from the Department of Defense and other government agencies. It is our station policy, and our Belo corporate policy, to never run these handouts."

It is a fact KGW has done more reporting on "the American Forces' side of this conflict" than any other television station in Oregon. We've had two crews imbedded with Oregon National Guard forces in Iraq. We've produced three documentaries on the work of Oregon National Guard soldiers in the War on Terror. It isn't that we don't report the military's side of the conflict... because we do. The key here is that KGW prefers to do independent reporting, using our own crews and equipment, instead of relying on the military to do our job for us.

As for broadcasting what "Al Jazeera puts out," occasionally, KGW will use video originally obtained by Al Jazeera (clearly marked by graphics on screen), in the same way we use video obtained by NBC (our network). At no point has any story, written or edited by Al Jazeera, appeared on KGW.

Thanks to everyone who wrote in. I really appreciate hearing from all of you... on both sides of the issue. It's clear the story sparked a healthy debate. And I continue to learn from your insights.

May 9, 2006

"Low Cost Airlines" Aren't Always the Cheapest

As NewsChannel 8 reports tonight, our own survey of 14 different trips shows the full-service, "legacy airlines" offered lower fares than "low-cost carriers" more than 60-percent of the time out of PDX. In cases where the LCCs had better fares... it was often by a small margin. Complete results of our survey are listed below.

Low Cost Carriers (LCCs) are considered airlines that offer generally low and uncomplicated fares, with few frills. LCCs typically offer only one class of service and fly many point-to-point, non-stop routes. Traditional low cost carriers serving Portland include Southwest Airlines, Frontier Airlines, and jetBlue.

Legacy airlines are the traditional "majors." These airlines usually offer a first or business class. They fly complicated route structures based on transferring passengers through hubs. They offer complex frequent-flyer programs, and many of them fly far-flung international routes around the world. Legacy carriers at PDX include Air Canada, Alaska Airlines/Horizon Air, America West/US Airways, American Airlines, Continental Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Hawaiian Airlines, Lusthansa German Airlines, Mexicana Airlines, Northwest Airlines, and United Airlines.

Some legacy airlines are working to "re-brand" themselves as low-cost carriers by streamlining their ticketing policies and route structures. America West/US Airways (the two will be fully merged in the next year) argues that it's the largest low-fare carrier in the world. But it still has first class and complicated ticketing rules. Likewise, Alaska Airlines says it's transformed itself into a low cost carrier... but most still consider it a legacy airline due to frills offered on board.

The most important information to note, though, is that there isn't much price difference between the LCCs and the legacy airlines. Most are very competitive on all routes. LCCs are charging more than ever before... mainly due to increasing fuel prices... so the legacy airlines are able to match or beat their lowest fares. These days you can't just assume Southwest will be cheapest because they always have been. We've found Southwest is often more expensive than Alaska, United, and many others out of PDX.

Low Cost Carriers vs. Legacy Airlines
Survey completed at noon on Tuesday, May 9th.
Survey uses airlines' own websites to determine fares for specific dates of travel.

These Trips Depart July 22nd and Return on July 29th

PDX to New York City
Continental (to Newark): $387
Southwest (to LaGuardia, via ATA Airlines): $428
jetBlue (to Kennedy): $439

PDX to San Francisco/Oakland
United (to SFO): $164
Southwest (to Oakland): $191

PDX to Chicago
United (to O'Hare): $445
Southwest (to Midway): $471
Frontier (to Midway): $588

PDX to Washington, DC
United (to Dulles): $430
Southwest (to Baltimore/Washington): $455
Frontier (to Reagan National): $687

PDX to Boston
US Airways: $429
United: $452
jetBlue: $494

PDX to Las Vegas
Southwest: $258
Alaska: $275

PDX to Phoenix
Southwest: $283
Alaska: $345

PDX to Los Angeles
Southwest (to LAX): $279
Alaska (to LAX): $317
United (to LAX): $317

PDX to Denver
Frontier: $287
Southwest: $307
United: $321
American: $321
Northwest: $321

PDX to Orlando
Southwest: $441
American: $454
jetBlue: $498
Frontier: $736

These Trips Depart on May 12th and Return on May 15th

PDX to Las Vegas
Alaska: $399
Southwest: $405

PDX to New York City
Northwest (to LaGuardia): $395
jetBlue (to Kennedy): $509
Southwest (to LaGuardia, via ATA Airlines): $656

PDX to Los Angeles
Alaska (to LAX): $408
Southwest (to LAX): $457

PDX to San Francisco/Oakland
Alaska (to SFO): $291
Southwest (to Oakland): $291

The legacy airlines have equal or better fares in 9 of the 14 markets tested. In one market where Southwest wins (Orlando), jetBlue and Frontier are two of the most expensive airlines.

Comments? E-mail me at jpenning@kgw.com.

May 8, 2006

"Captive Audience" for Military PR

United Box Logo.jpg

Tonight NewsChannel 8 reports on the inflight entertainment you see on United Airlines flights from Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, and San Francisco to Portland. In the interest of full diclosure, it should first be noted, KGW's network, NBC, is paid to develop United's inflight programming. But now, United admits it's added a 13-minute segment that's not produced by NBC... though it may be difficult to distinguish it.

That 13-minute segment is called "Today's Military". It looks a lot like an NBC News program, profiling ten members of the US Military, all over the world... including Oregon National Guardsman Andrew Canfield. Some say its "passed-off" as a news program, even though its origins are quite different than the orgins of a news segment.

"Today's Military" was shot, produced, written, and edited by the Department of Defense. Agents there admit it's a recruiting video, meant to encourage young men and women to enlist. Yet, at no point in the inflight program, is that fact ever noted. There are no graphics on the screen, no credits, no voiceover to tell viewers what they're really watching. The Department of Defense isn't mentioned once. Not once, is any branch of the military tied to the video's production. Some passengers say it's intentionally meant to deceive... and look like the rest of the NBC News product.

The Department of Defense paid United $36,000 for the video to run on westbound flights, from April 17th to May 17th. Part of the agreement specified the DoD wouldn't be indentified. In the agreement, United says the video will reach about 3-million travelers.

Media ethics experts say, at best, it's deceiving not to identity the video's producer. Ethics experts say its important that people know they're being advertised to, and in this case, they do not. Moreover, they say, airline passengers are a captive audience, who can't just change the channel.

United says it often sells video spots. It says it averages between 7 and 15 minutes of paid video programming per 2-hour segment of NBC Inflight.

The Air Travelers Association says airline passengers should get used to it. It says, as the airlines look for ways to boost their revenue, and offset record fuel prices, they'll likely sell more commercial spots... although the organization says it's intellectually dishonest for an airline not to identify a commercial as such. It says it's up to passengers to watch all inflight programming with a critical eye.

The United Airlines segment of "Today's Military" is just one in a series. The Department of Defense has already produced a similar 22-minute program, that's been run on two television stations. And it says it's producing a 48-minute feature that will be distributed to 40,000 high schools around the country. The longer versions don't identify the Department of Defense, either.

KGW has received a number of similar "video new releases" from the Department of Defense and other government agencies. It is our station policy, and our Belo corporate policy, to never run these handouts.

Have a comment? E-mail me at jpenning@kgw.com.

May 2, 2006

Alaska Offers Spring Mileage Plan Discounts

Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air are offering special, cheap tickets for Mileage Plan travel this Spring. Instead of the usual 20,000 miles for a free ticket, Mileage Plan members can use just 15,000 for a free ticket in select markets. The offer is valid in the following city pairs:

Portland to:
- Phoenix
- Tucson
- Las Vegas
- Reno
- Denver

The offer valid for travel between April 18 and June 8, 2006. The 5,000 mile discount is not available on May 26-29, 2006... Memorial Day weekend.

Go here to book your ticket, or see read about the terms and conditions.

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31





Powered by
Movable Type 3.36
Advertisement